摘要
新世纪以来,与回归文学本位呼声相对应的,古代文学研究的创新追求呈现出向"大文学"理念回归的倾向,如民间文学、比较文学及其方法论的介入等。但学术成果评价中往往忽视研究的阶段性、专题性,应鼓励专题研究的多元化。跨学科研究并不应该以某些严格的、一统化的界定为标准,学术史历程中具有个性化的论著,可能更具有原创性和启发力。因此不宜用是否符合某些明确的学科定义来苛求,把他人或相邻学科旧有研究略加补充就另改旗号。学术史总结离不开具体的学术论著的评判,同类著作中当时影响较大的,在实际上的学术史中未必都原创性很高。应该进行文学现象学意义上的梳理与汇总、文学研究方法意义上的梳理与应用汇总、增多专题性和个案性质的学术研究史总结。不同学科对研究现状的反思,固然受到客观实际制约,也不应因此忽视二级学科及其研究方向自身的反思维度和力度的差异性。
Since the new century,corresponding to the voice of returning to the literary standard,the innovation in ancient literature manifests the tendency of returning to the conception of"great literature"such as folk literature,comparative literature and their methodology.However,the evaluation of academic achievements always ignores the staged and monographic research.Thus,monographic research's diversification should be encouraged.Interdisciplinary research should not take a few strict and unified definitions as standard.Works with specific character are likely to be more original and enlightening.Therefore,they shouldn't be judged too harshly through whether they conform to some explicit definition in an individual discipline,and it is improper to rename the study which combines the existing finds and some new ideas.The review of academic history can not be separated from the discussion of concrete academic works.A work having a significant impact in a historical context is not necessary with great originality in academic history.It is necessary to summarize the phenomenology of literature,the application of literature research method,and the academic research history.
出处
《广东社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第3期152-159,255-256,共8页
Social Sciences in Guangdong
基金
国家社会科学基金项目"还珠楼主小说母题古今演变研究"(项目号16BZW114)的阶段性成果
