期刊文献+

《豳风·七月》“条桑”歧解考辨——兼谈对《诗经》词义训释的启示

A Study of the Meaning of “Tiaosang” in Book of Songs·Bin Feng·July and Its Inspiration
下载PDF
导出
摘要 《诗经·豳风·七月》"条桑"一词歧解主要有"挑取""修剪"二种,今人围绕此两解聚讼纷纭。从"条桑"目的、方式入手,通过稽考历代训诂材料,结合周代农俗、全诗句式进行考辨发现,两解互为补充,实为"条桑"一体双翼之解,但释为广义"修剪"更清晰顺畅,也更具包容性。这种理解将采桑与维护融合在一起,与此农事活动的实际过程相符;传达出农人对自然的感恩与欣悦,与全诗辛苦烦难中渗透的宽宏、质朴气质一致,也与全诗句式更相合。出现歧解的主因是理解视角不同,一曰文化视角,一曰文学视角;由此进一步补论疏不破注、双重视角、合理转义等《诗经》词义训释原则。 The word “ tiaosang” in Book of Songs · Bin Feng · July is mainly interpreted as “pick out” or “ prune”. By ex-ploring the purpose and method of “ tiaosang”, studying the word explanations in a i dynasties, considering the agricultural cus-toms in the Zhou Dynasty, and analyzing the sentence patterns of this poem, it is found other, and the meaning of “ prune” seems more clear and smooth and inclusive. This kind of uand the maintenance of mulberry leaves, which is true to the actual process of farmingtheir gratitude to nature, consistent with their generous, rustic temperament in spite of hard work, style. The main reason for the divergent interpretations is that different perspectives are involvedand literary perspective. The paper adds a new way to the principles for word interpretation for Book of Songs.
作者 李耀平 LI Yao-ping(College of Liberal Arts,Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350008 , Chin)
出处 《集美大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2018年第2期115-121,共7页 Journal of Jimei University:Philosophy and Social Sciences
关键词 条桑 《诗经·豳风·七月》 词义训释 tiaosang Book of Songs · Bin Feng · July) the explanation of word meaning
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献25

  • 1何幼琦.《夏小正》的内容和时代[J].西北大学学报(哲学社会科学版),1987,17(1):23-30. 被引量:8
  • 2陈久金.论《夏小正》是十月太阳历[J].自然科学史研究,1982,1(4):305-319. 被引量:33
  • 3陈久金.北斗星斗柄指向考[J].自然科学史研究,1994,13(3):209-214. 被引量:11
  • 4郑玄笺,孔颖达疏.《毛诗正义》.《十三经注疏》第329页. 被引量:2
  • 5[12]Hayden White, Tropics of Discourse: Essays in Cultural Criticism(Baltimore & London: The Johns Hopkins UP, 1978), p.233,pp. 126 - 7. 被引量:1
  • 6关于福柯对"考古学"方法的讨论,参见The Order ofThings :An Archaeology of Human Sciences (New York: Vintage Books, 1994), pp. xxii-xxiii; The Archaeology of Knowledge ( London: Tavistock Publications Limited, 1972), pp. 167 - 77 .关于福柯为何使用"考古学"这个术语,参见Foucault Live ( New York: Semiotext ( e), 1989), pp. 57 - 8. 被引量:1
  • 7[10]Michel Foucault, The Order of Things: An Archaeology of Human Scieaces ( New York: Vintage Books, 1994), p. xxii, p. xiv. 被引量:1
  • 8Hayden White,"Foucault Decoded:Notes from Underground" in Tropics of Discourse, pp. 230 - 260. 被引量:1
  • 9[6][16][18][19][20]Hayden White, Figural Realism: Studies in the Mimesis Effect ( Baltimore & London: The Johns Hopkins UP, 1999),p.21,p.9,pp.7 - 8,pp.51 - 2,p.22,p.9. 被引量:1
  • 10[8][14]Hayden White, Metahistory : The Historical Imagination in the Nineteenth Century Europe ( Baltimore & London: The Johns Hopkins UP, 1973), p. 34, pp. 34 - 7,p.6. 被引量:1

共引文献47

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部