期刊文献+

基层医院耻骨上经膀胱和经尿道切除大体积前列腺的比较 被引量:4

The comparison of efficacy of open and transurethral prostatectomy for treating big volume prostate in primary hospital
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的比较基层医院耻骨上经膀胱前列腺切除术(TVP)和等离子经尿道前列腺电切术(PKRP)治疗大体积前列腺患者的安全性及疗效。方法将2009年6月至2012年5月在佛山市禅城区中心医院泌尿外科经尿动力学与超声检查诊断膀胱出口梗阻并前列腺体积>80 ml的80例患者将随机分为TVP和PKRP组,记录并比较所有患者术前、术后3个月、12个月随访资料,包括国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)、生活质量评分(QOL)、最大尿流率(Qmax)、围手术期资料、术中情况、术后并发症情况等。结果 80例入组患者中,69例完成12个月的随访,两组患者在手术时间、手术前列腺切除重量差异无统计学意义,PKRP组出血量、留置尿管时间、膀胱冲洗时间、住院天数均显著优于TVP组,术后随访3个月、12个月,两组患者IPSS、Qmax、QOL差异无统计学意义。结论TVP和PKRP都可用于治疗前列腺体积80 ml以上前列腺增生患者,但PKRP创伤更小、恢复更快,利于在基层医院临床推广。 Objective To compare the safety and efficacy oftransvesical prostatectomy(TVP)and plasma kinetic resection of prostate (PKRP) for treating big volume prostate in primary hospital. Methods Eighty patients with urodynamic obstruction and whose prostate volume was bigger than 80 ml were prospectively randomized and assigned to TVP group or PKRP group. Patients were assessed preoperatively and followed up at 3 and 12 months postoperatively. International prostate symptom score, quality of life score and maximum flow rate were obtained. Perioperative data and postoperative complications were also recorded. Results Among 80 participants, 69 patients completed 12 months of follow-up. There were no significant differences in operation time and the weight of resecting prostate between the two groups. The PKRP group had significantly less blood loss of operation, shorter postoperative bladder washing time, shorter postoperative catheterization time and shorter hospital stay than the TVP group. There were no significant differences in International prostate symptom score, quality of life score and maximum flow rate between the two groups at 3 or 12 months of follow-up. Conclusions Both PKRP and TVP are effective alternatives for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia whose volume, is bigger than 80 ml, but PKRP is less wound and recover rapidly so that it worth to popularize in primary hospital.
作者 游猛 郑彬 陈岳 詹河涓 谢克基 欧汝彪 胡成 狄金明 You Meng;Zheng Bin;Chen Yue;Zhan Hejuan;Xie Keji;Ou Nvbiao;Hu Cheng;Di Jinming(Department of Urology, Chancheng District Central Hospital, Foshan 528031, China;Guangzhou First Muntetpal People s Hospital, Guangzhou 510180, China, 3Department of Urology, the Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630, China.)
出处 《中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版)》 2018年第2期94-97,共4页 Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition)
基金 佛山市科技局医学类科技攻关项目(200908089)
关键词 大体积 前列腺增生 前列腺切除术 安全性 效果 Large volume, benign prostatic hyperplasia PKRP Transvesical prostatectomy Safety Efficacy
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献106

  • 1温星桥,吴杰英,胡成,方友强,王喻,黄文涛,叶春伟,陶奕然,周祥福,高新.经尿道前列腺电切术后低血压的原因分析及治疗体会[J].中华临床医师杂志(电子版),2012,6(18):110-112. 被引量:3
  • 2杨建军,姚茂银,王晓明,苑章.经尿道前列腺电汽化术后并发症及防治对策(附920例报告)[J].中华男科学杂志,2005,11(12):922-924. 被引量:23
  • 3叶敏.电汽化手术//吴阶平.吴阶平泌尿外科学.济南:山东科学技术出版社,2006:1224-1235. 被引量:2
  • 4廖国栋,沈周俊,周卸来,陈善闻,陈军,汪朔,史时芳,张志根,蔡松良.经尿道前列腺电切术患者转开放手术的危险因素分析[J].中华男科学杂志,2007,13(7):613-616. 被引量:6
  • 5Muzzonigro G, Milanese G, Minardi D, et al. Safety and efficacy of transurethral resection of prostate glands up to 150ml: A prospec- tive comparative study with 1 years of followup. J Urol, 2004, 172 (2): 611-615. 被引量:1
  • 6Alschibaja M, May F, Treiber U, et al. Recent improvements in transurethral high-frequency electrosurgery of the prostate. BJU Int, 2006, 97(2): 243-246. 被引量:1
  • 7高新,周祥福.微创泌尿外科手术与图谱,广东:广东科技出版社,2006,395-403. 被引量:1
  • 8Roehrborn CG. BPH progression: concept and key learning from MTOPS, ALTESS, COMBAT, and ALF- ONE.BJUInt2008; 101 Suppl 3:17-21. 被引量:1
  • 9McCulloch P, Taylor I, Sasako M, et al. Randomised trials in surgery: problems and possible solutions. BMJ 2002; 324(7351): 1448-1451. 被引量:1
  • 10Tan A, Liao C, Mo Z, et al. Meta-analysis of holmium laser enucleation versus transurethral resection of the prostate for symptomatic prostatic obstruction. BrJSurg 2007; 94(10): 1201-1208. 被引量:1

共引文献80

同被引文献36

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部