摘要
京津冀协同发展离不开京津冀区域司法协同治理,长期以来,京津冀三地司法发展呈现差异化、失衡化形态,这必将影响区域司法协同治理的实效,三地法院裁判规则的冲突、"类案不同判"的现象,审判监督指导机制的不完善,使得司法裁判权威性受到质疑。以近年来天津法院司法标准化改革实践为样本,探索实现京津冀区域司法裁量标准化的可行路径,即确定司法裁量标准化的种类和内容,制定实体性裁量标准的方式,加强参考案例研究,加大京津冀法官培训交流力度。注意客观面对三地法院的司法差异化现实,防止不当限制法官自由裁量权,避免忽视事实认定的裁量标准化。
The coordinated development of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region cannot be separated from the re- gional judicial coordination of the region. For a long time, the judicial development of Beijing-Tianjin-I-Iebei region has presented a different and unbalanced form, which will surely affect the effectiveness of regional ju- dicial coordination governance. These problems, such as the conflict of the judgment rules between courts in three places, the phenomenon of ＂different sentences in similar cases＂ and the imperfection of the trial super- vision and guidance mechanism, have challenged the judicial authority. In view of this, based on the judicial standardization of Tianjin judicial reform practice in recent years, the group explored the feasible path of the standardization of judicial discretion in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, including the types and contents of the standardization of judicial discretion, the way of making substantive discretion standard, strengthening refer- ence case study, and increasing the intensity of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei judge training and exchange. In addi- tion, we should also pay attention to the judicial differentiation between courts in three places, prevent im- proper restrictions on judges＇ discretion, and avoid ignoring the fact finding on the standardization of judicial discretion.
作者
天津市第二中级人民法院课题组
李季红
丁津翠
马凤岗
王娟
Tianjin No two Intermediate People＇ s Court Research Group(Tianjin No2 Intermediate People＇s Court, Tianjin 300210, China)
出处
《天津法学》
2018年第1期75-81,共7页
Tianjin Legal Science
关键词
司法裁量
协同治理
裁量标准
案例研究
共享培训
judicial discretion
collaborative governance
discretion standard
case study
share-training
