摘要
应整体考察合同编"室内稿",在充分认识其开创性成绩的同时,指出在法学方法及法政策方面可继续努力的方向。在具体制度上,既有欠缺书面形式、债务暂时无力偿还、合同保全、因第三人原因所致违约等等老问题,也有合同订立前单方允诺、网络订单、网购快递交付、"中介合同"等新问题,还有出租房屋优先购买权、建设工程施工合同无效等汲取司法解释经验入典带来的体系衔接问题,均需慎思。解约法等高难度的基础领域在法典编纂中,也不应错失反思、重构的契机。
We should study the internal draft of the contract wholly,and,while fully recognizing its pioneering achievements,point out the direction that we can continue to work in the methodology of jurisprudence and policy. In specific system,there are not only old issues such as lack of written form、unable to repay the debt temporarily、the preservation of the contracts、break the contracts because of the third party but new problems such as the unilateral promise before the conclusion of a contract、online orders、the delivery of online orders、intermediate contracts. Also there are matters like preemptive right of rental houses、invalid contract for erection of construction projects,which are written into code by learning from the judicial interpretation experience therefore bring about the problem of cohesion. All of above need considering carefully. The difficult basic fields such as the law of break an agreement should not miss the opportunity of reflection and reconstruction in the codification.
出处
《法学杂志》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第4期9-19,共11页
Law Science Magazine
基金
教育部人文社科研究青年基金项目(项目编号:12YJC820095)
国家社科基金重点项目(项目编号:16AFX015)的阶段性成果
关键词
民法典合同编
室内稿
立法论研究
contract series in civil code
the internal draft
legislative study
