期刊文献+

佩雷尔曼新修辞学的非形式逻辑属性 被引量:1

On the Informal Logic Attributes of Perelman’s New Rhetoric
原文传递
导出
摘要 为探寻价值判断的逻辑基础,佩雷尔曼提出了名为"新修辞学"的论证理论,它不仅彰显了对传统修辞学的继承、发展和超越,也凸显了听众的重要性。由于作为论证理论的新修辞学与北美地区的非形式逻辑在研究目标、具体论题上都高度一致,而且前者对后者的发展产生了直接影响,因而,佩雷尔曼的新修辞学可以被视为一种非形式逻辑。 In order to explore the logical basis of value judgment,Perelman proposed the argumentation theory called "New Rhetoric". It not only embodies the inheritance,development and transcendence to traditional rhetoric,but also highlights the importance of the audience. Because the New Rhetoric and the informal logic in North America are highly consistent in the research objectives and specific issues,and the former has a direct impact over the development of the latter,Perelman's New Rhetoric can be regarded as a kind of informal logic.
作者 蔡广超 CAI Guang-chao(School of Political Science and Law, Yan'an University, Yan'an 716000, Chin)
出处 《湖南科技大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第1期25-32,共8页 Journal of Hunan University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition)
基金 国家社科基金青年项目(13CZX063) 陕西省教育厅科学研究项目(16JK1837) 延安大学博士科研启动项目(YDBK2017-12)
关键词 新修辞学 论证理论 非形式逻辑 New Rhetoric argumentation theory informal logic
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献30

  • 1[8]哈贝马斯.在事实与规范之间[M].童世骏,译.上海:三联书店,2003. 被引量:3
  • 2武宏志,周建武,唐坚,非形式逻辑导论,2009年,北京:人民出版社. 被引量:2
  • 3R. Audi, 1999, The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge Uni- versity Press. 被引量:1
  • 4E. M. Barth and E. C. Krabbe, 1982, From Axiom to Dialogue." A Philosophical Study of Logics and Argumentation, Berlin/New York: Walter de Gmyter. 被引量:1
  • 5R. D. Dearin, 1982, "Perelman's concept of quasi-logical argument: A critical elabo- ration", in J. R. Cox and C. A. Willard (eds.), Advances in Argumentation Theory and Research, OD. 78-94, Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press. 被引量:1
  • 6F. H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst and A. F. Snoeck Henkemans, 1996, Fundamen- tals of Argumentation Theory: A Handbook of Historical Backgrounds and Contem- porary Developments, Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum. 被引量:1
  • 7F. H. van Eemeren and R. Grootendorst, 1984, The Study of Argumentation, New York: Irvington. 被引量:1
  • 8J. M. Farrar, 1994, Constructing Chaim Perelman: Implications of the New Rhetoric for Teaching Argumentation in the Composition Classroom, Ph.D. Thesis, Purdue Uni- versity. 被引量:1
  • 9T. B. Farrell, 1986, "Reason and rhetorical practice: The inventional agenda of Chaim Perelman", in J. L. Golden and J. J. Pilotta (eds.), Practical Reasoning in Human Af- fairs, pp. 259-286, Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel. 被引量:1
  • 10S. K. Foss, K. A. Foss and R. Trapp, 2002, Contemporary Perspectives on Rhetoric, Waveland Press. 被引量:1

共引文献3

同被引文献3

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部