期刊文献+

长链非编码RNA高表达与胃癌预后不良相关性的Meta分析 被引量:4

The association between long non-coding RNA overexpression and poor prognostic of gastric cancer: a meta-analysis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的系统评价长链非编码RNA(Lnc RNA)表达水平与胃癌患者临床特征及预后价值的关系。方法计算机检索Pub Med、EMbase、The Cochrane Library、Web of Science、CNKI、VIP、Wan Fang Data和CBM数据库,搜集有关Lnc RNA高表达与胃癌预后相关性的研究,检索时限均为建库至2017年4月。由2名研究者独立筛选文献、提取资料并评价纳入研究的偏倚风险后,采用Stata 12.0软件进行Meta分析。结果共纳入21个病例-对照研究。Meta分析结果显示:Lnc RNA高表达胃癌患者TNM分期较晚[OR=0.29,95%CI(0.24,0.35),P<0.001]、浸润更深[OR=0.24,95%CI(0.12,0.49),P<0.001]、总生存期(OS)[HR=2.52,95%CI(2.07,3.06),P<0.001]及无病生存期(DFS)[HR=2.31,95%CI(1.75,3.05),P<0.001]更短。结论胃癌患者Lnc RNA高表达是胃癌预后不良的危险因素。受纳入研究数量和质量的限制,上述结论尚待开展更多高质量研究予以验证。 Objectives To systematically review the association between the expression level of LncRNA and clinicopathological features and prognostic value of gastric cancer. Methods We searched PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, VIP, WanFang Data and CBM databases to collect studies on the association between LncRNA overexpression and prognosis for gastric cancer from inception to April 2017. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies, then, meta-analysis was performed by using Stata 12.0 software. Results A total of 21 case-control studies were included. The results of meta- analysis showed that: LncRNA overexpression patients had poor TNM stage (OR=0.29, 95%CI 0.24 to 0.35, P〈0.001), deeper tumor invasion (OR=0.24, 95%CI 0.12 to 0.49, P〈0.001), shorter overall survival (OS) (HR=2.52, 95%CI 2.07 to 3.06, P〈0.001) and disease-free survival (DFS) (HR=2.31, 95%CI 1.75 to 3.05, P〈0.001). Conclusions LncRNA overexpression is a poor prognosis risk factor for gastric cancer patients. Due to limited quantity and quality of the included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify above conclusions.
出处 《中国循证医学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2018年第3期286-293,共8页 Chinese Journal of Evidence-based Medicine
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(编号:31670847) 甘肃省卫生行业科研计划项目(编号:GSWSK2016-03)
关键词 长链非编码RNA 高表达 胃癌 相关性 META分析 病例-对照研究 Long non-coding RNA Overexpression Gastric cancer Association Meta-analysis Case-control study
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献20

  • 1Huedo-Medina TB, Sanchez-Meca J, Marin-Martinez F. Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q and Is index? [J]. Psychol Methods, 2006,11 (2) : 193-206. 被引量:1
  • 2Palma S, Delgado-Rodriguez M. Assessment of publication bias in meta-analyses of cardiovascular diseases [J]. J Epidemiol Community Health, 2005,59(10) : 864-869. 被引量:1
  • 3Dural S. The trim and fill method[M]//Rothstein HR, Sutton A J, Borenstein M. Publication bias in meta-analysis-prevention, assessment and adjustments. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2005 : 127-144. 被引量:1
  • 4Hopkins L, Smaill F. Antibiotic prophylaxis regimens and drugs for cesarean section (Review). Available from http:// www.who.int/rhl/reviews/CD001136.pdf. 被引量:1
  • 5Steichen TJ, RJRT. sbe39:Nonparametrie trim and fill analysis of publication bias in meta-analysis [J]. Stata Technical Bulletin, 2000,57 : 8-14. 被引量:1
  • 6Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.0 [updated February 2008]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2008. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org. 被引量:1
  • 7Peters JL, Sutton AJ, Jones DR, et al. Performance of the trim and fill method in the presence of publication bias and between-study heterogeneity [J]. Stat Med, 2007,26 (25): 4544-4562. 被引量:1
  • 8罗杰,冷卫东,曾宪涛,等.系统评价Meta分析理论与实践[M].北京:军事医学科学出版社,2013:508-12. 被引量:6
  • 9Higgins JPT,Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Syslematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Coehrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrana-hamtbook.org. 被引量:1
  • 10Sterne JAC. Meta-Analysis in Slala: An Updated Collection from the Stata Journal [M]. Stala press,2009. 被引量:1

共引文献122

同被引文献51

引证文献4

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部