期刊文献+

37例麻风患者的家庭集聚性调查分析 被引量:6

Investigation and analysis of family agglomeration in 37 cases of leprosy patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:明确麻风家庭感染者的发病情况。方法:利用全国麻风病防治信息管理系统(LEPMIS)数据库,描述性分析麻风家庭感染者的发病情况。结果:符合条件的共17户家庭37例麻风患者,其中多菌型患者33例,少菌型4例;密切接触5年内发病4例(10.81%),5~10年发病者11例(29.73%),超过10年发病者13例(35.14%),不明时间者9例(24.32%);其中因父母子女关系感染17例(45.95%)、祖孙关系5例(13.51%)、兄弟关系2例(5.41%)。结论:多菌型麻风是家庭传染者的主要传染源。 Objective: To understand the epidemiological features of leprosy in household contacts in Shandhluo. Methods: The data of leprosy patients abtained from Leprosy Management Information System( LEPMIS) database was analyzed. Results: A total of 37 patients in 17 families were analyzed. Out of 37 patients,34 patients were multibacillary and 4 patients were paucibacillary. The incubation period from index patients to secondary cases was 5 years in 4 patients( 10.81%),5-10 years in 11( 29.73%),〉 10 years in 13( 35.14%) and the time was undefined in 9( 24.32%). Seventeen( 45.95%) patients were transmitted from parents or children,5( 13. 51%) from grandparents to grandchildren and 2( 5. 41%) from brothers.Conclusion: The patients with multibacillary is the main infection source in the transmission of the disease in familes.
出处 《中国麻风皮肤病杂志》 2018年第2期67-69,共3页 China Journal of Leprosy and Skin Diseases
关键词 麻风 家庭 传染 leprosy family infection
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献52

  • 1邓仲明,张锡宝,刘宇伦.麻风病基本消灭阶段的流行病学分析及防治策略探讨[J].岭南皮肤性病科杂志,2002,9(3):217-219. 被引量:3
  • 2唐俊柏,李溪莹(校对).麻风病人发现方法对比分析[J].中国公共卫生,2005,21(11):1288-1288. 被引量:6
  • 3李月宜,黄健.2000-2006年郴州市麻风新发病例延迟诊断相关分析[J].中国热带医学,2007,7(6):990-991. 被引量:6
  • 4WHO. Global leprosy situation, 2006. Wkly Epidemiol Rec 81, 309- 316 (2006). 被引量:1
  • 5Moraes MO, Cardoso CC, Vanderborght PR, et al. Genetics of host response in leprosy. Lepr Rev 2006; 77 : 189 - 202. 被引量:1
  • 6Moet FJ, Pahan D, Schuring RP. et al. Physical distance, genetic relationship, age, and leprosy classification are independent risk factors for leprosy in contacts of patients with leprosy. J Infect Dis 2006; 193 : 346 - 353. 被引量:1
  • 7Keane J. Tumor necrosis factor blockers and reactivation of latent tuberculosis. Clin Infect Dis 2004; 39: 300 - 302. 被引量:1
  • 8Gorodezky C, Alaez C, Munguia A, et al. Molecular mechanisms of MHC linked susceptibility in leprosy: towards the development of synthetic vaccines. Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2004; 84 : 82 - 92. 被引量:1
  • 9Shankarkumar U, Ghosh K, Badakere S, et al. Novel HLA class Ⅰ alleles associated with Indian leprosy patients. J Biomed Biotechnol 2003 ; 2003 : 208 - 211. 被引量:1
  • 10Joko S, Numaga J, Kawashima H, et al. Human leukocyte antigens in forms of leprosy among Japanese patients. Int J Lepr 2000;68:49 - 56. 被引量:1

共引文献23

同被引文献53

引证文献6

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部