摘要
在金融投资商品交易领域,通说观点认为,"卖者有责"是"买者自负"的前提;而卖者又承担适合性义务,因此适合性义务就成为了"买者自负"原则的前提。如此认定两者关系并不合适。实际上,适合性义务与"买者自负"原则均各自独立,但互有影响。把握两者的关系应当回归买卖合同关系,本质上卖方被科予适合性义务是为了扶正已经倾斜的交易天平,使其回归平衡。不过,立法调适适合性义务和"买责自负"原则的关系应当坚持双向调节,把握好强度和方法。
In the field of financial investment products＂ transaction, it is argued that ＂ seller is responsible＂ is the premise of ＂ caveat emptor＂. While the seller assumes the suitability obligation, thus the suitability obligation becomes the premise of ＂caveat emptor＂ principle. It＇s not appropriate to identify the relationship. In fact, the suitability obligation and the ＂ caveat emptor＂ principle are independent and interacted. The understanding of the relationship should be returned to the contract relationship. Essentially, the seller is granted the suitability obligation to support the balance of the already tihed trade balance. obligation and ＂ caveat emptor＂ principle grasp the strength and method. However, the adjustment of suitability should stick to two-way regulation and
作者
杜一华
DU Yi-hua(Central University of Finance and Economics,Beijing 100081 China)
出处
《河北法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第3期184-192,共9页
Hebei Law Science
关键词
金融投资商品
适合性义务
“买者自负”
“卖者有责”
双向调节
financial investment products
suitability obligation
＂ caveat emptor＂
＂ seller isresponsible＂
two-way regulation
