摘要
协商民主是一种治权意义上的民主,民主化程度与治理绩效有很强的相关性。案例研究表明:因受宏观制度环境的影响,竞争性选举民主在基层难以为继,因而在推进基层治理绩效方面并不明显。协商民主因关注民众的平等协商、公平参与,从而更有利于改善民生问题和提高治理绩效,其中,精英的引领为民主与民生的链接架起了桥梁。当然,协商民主的水平取决于民众的素质及他们对公共事务的关注度,也与信息的公开程度有关。因此,通过推动村务公开,发挥精英的引领作用,在协商中促进精英与民众的良性互动是提高基层治理绩效的重要路径。
Deliberative democracy is a democracy of right of administration, which makes the democratic level relate to governance performance. The case study revealed that the improvement of the democratic level could promote people＇s right, while good people＇s livelihood could lay foundations for improving the quality of democracy, in which the leading of the elite put up a bridge for the link between democracy and people＇s livelihood. Because the deliberative democracy pays close attention to equal consultation and fair participation of the public, it is more favorable for improving people＇s livelihood and governance performance. Of course, the level of deliberative democratization depends on the quality of the people and their concern to public affairs, and also is related to the disclosure of information. Accordingly, the important path to improve the performance of grass roots governance is to develop the benign interaction between the elite and the people by pushing forward village affairs and playing the leading role of the elite.
出处
《中国行政管理》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第2期58-64,共7页
Chinese Public Administration
基金
国家社会科学基金项目"包容性治理研究"(编号:016BSH012)
关键词
精英引领
协商民主
村务公开
the leading elite, deliberative democracy, public village affairs
