摘要
纪德君教授的《世代累积型集体创作说再思考》,对徐朔方先生提出的"世代累积型集体创作说"仍多误解。徐先生的"世代累积型集体创作说"是综合考察了宋(金)元明时期包括杂剧、南戏、话本在内的小说戏曲传世之作的结果,并非仅仅是考察了明代"四大奇书"所得的结论。如果仅仅从明代"四大奇书"出发批评徐先生的"世代累积型集体创作说",难免以偏概全。纪教授一再认为徐先生的"世代累积型集体创作说"是贬低了四大奇书写定者的创造性劳动,当与纪教授的非此即彼的思维方式有关。
Professor Jijunde＇ s argument about ＂reconsidering the collective creativity of Generations＂ misunderstood Professor Xushuofang＇ s argument of ＂collective creativity of generations＂ in several ways. Professor Xu＇ s argument was based on the comprehensive survey of the stories and operas that handed down throughout generations, including opera, southern drama and the scripts for story-telling in the Song, Jin, Yuan and Ming Dynasties, not only based on the research of the ＂Four Great Classical Novels＂ in the Ming Dynasty. That＇ s why it is quite partial to judge Professor Xu＇ s argument only by focusing on the criticism of the ＂Four Great Classical Novels＂ in the Ming Dynasty. It must have something to do with Professor Ji＇s Either-this-or-that way of thinking, so that he considered Professor Xu＇s argument as a depreciation of authorship of the ＂Four Great Classical Novels＂.
作者
周明初
Zhou Mingchu(College of Humanities, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310028, Zhejiang, China)
出处
《长江学术》
2017年第4期43-52,共10页
Yangtze River Academic
关键词
世代累积型作品
集体创作
个人创作
四大奇书
Collective Creativity of Generations
Collective Creation
Personal Creativity
Four Great Classical Novels
