摘要
本文是对纪德君教授《世代累积型集体创作说献疑》的回应。本文认为徐朔方先生的世代累积型集体创作说并没有如纪文所说"在很大程度上贬低了作家个体独特的创造性劳动,并进而没收了罗贯中等人的著作权",并非是与"对‘进化论’、‘人民群众是历史的创造者’等理论观点的片面认识有关",而是与他熟悉中外文学,能以西方文学为参照,注重中外文学的比较有关。本文还对纪文在明代"四大奇书"研究方面对徐先生的批评提出辩驳。
The article is an answer to ＂Some Questions to the Doctrine of Collective Creative Work Passing on from Generation to Generation＂ written by Prof. Ji Dejun. The article points out that Mr. Xu Shuofang＇s doctrine of collective creative work passing on from generation to generation does not ＂underestimate the personal creative work greatly, or cancel the copyright of Luo Guanzhong＂. The doctrine is not related to ＂one- sidedness in understanding the theories including ＇the evolutionism＇ and ＇history if created by the mass of people＇. It is based on the factors that Mr. Xu Shuofang was well acquainted with Chinese and foreign literature, he referred to the west literature and placed a special emphasis on comparison between Chinese literature and foreign literature. Moreover, aiming at the criticism on Mr. Xu Shuofang＇s researches of ＂Four Remarkable Book＂ in the Ming Dynasty, the article gives a refutation.
出处
《南京师范大学文学院学报》
2007年第3期138-145,共8页
Journal of School of Chinese Language and Culture Nanjing Normal University
关键词
世代累积型作品
集体创作
个人创作
the work passing on from generation to generation, collective creative work, personal creative work
