期刊文献+

肾素血管紧张素系统阻断剂对冠状动脉介入治疗后对比剂肾病的影响 被引量:4

Effects of renin angiotensin system inhibitors on contrast-induced acute kidney injury after percutaneous coronary intervention
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的观察肾素血管紧张素系统(RAS)阻断剂(RASI)对冠状动脉介入术后对比剂急性肾损害(CI-AKI)的影响。方法根据介入术前RASI应用情况将401例患者分为3组:血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)组(n=204);血管紧张素受体拮抗剂(ARB)组(n=63);非RASI组(n=134)。同时根据估算的肾小球滤过率(eGFR),再将各组分为肾功能正常组[eGFR>90mL/(min·1.73m^2)]和轻度肾功能不全组[eGFR 60~90mL/(min·1.73m^2)]两个亚组。所有患者围手术期均给予常规水化,测定冠状动脉介入术前及术后24、72h肾功能变化,观察CI-AKI的发生情况。结果与非RASI组相比,应用对比剂后72h,ARB组(14.3%比5.2%,P<0.05)和ACEI组(11.3%比5.2%,P<0.05)CI-AKI的发生率均升高。ACEI组介入前与介入后血肌酐、eGFR和血尿素氮水平与非RASI组差异无统计学意义,ARB组血肌酐高于ACEI组和非RASI组[24h:(98.0±46.8)比(86.0±33.0)、(84.4±24.9)μmol/L;72h:(102.5±49.2)比(91.1±38.9)、(87.2±26.0)μmol/L;均P<0.05],eGFR低于ACEI组和非RASI组[24h:(74.3±23.0)比(84.4±29.0)、(84.2±24.7)mL/(min·1.73m^2);72h:(70.6±21.9)比(80.1±27.7)、(81.4±25.3)mL/(min·1.73m^2);均P<0.05]。在肾功能正常人群,ARB组CI-AKI发生率显著高于非RASI组(17.1%比4.5%,P<0.05);在轻度肾功能不全人群,ACEI组CI-AKI发生率较非RASI组升高(13.4%比6.7%,P<0.05)。结论冠状动脉介入术前ARB治疗显著增加肾功能正常者CI-AKI发生,而对肾功能受损患者,ACEI显著增加CI-AKI发生。 Objective To investigate the effects of renin angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors(RASI) on contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods A total of 401 patients were divided into three groups according to RASI used before PCI: angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) group (n=204), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) group ( n = 63 ) and non-RASI group (n = 134 ). Then these participants were subdivided into normal renal function group[eGFR〉90 mL/( min · 1.73 m2 )] and mild renal dysfunction group[eGFR 60-90 mL/{ min·1.73 m2 )]. Conventional hydration was conducted in all subjects before and after PCI. The changes of renal function before and 24 h and 72 h after coronary intervention were monitored, and the occurrence of CI-AKI was observed. Results The incidence rate of CI-AKI was higher in ACEI and ARB groups than that in non-RASI group (14.3 %, 11.3% vs 5.2 %, both P〈0.05). The differences of serum creatinine, eGFR and blood urea nitrogen level before and after PCI were not statistically significant in ACEI and non-RASI group. Serum creatinine level was higher [24 h: (98.0±46.8) vs (86.0±33.0), (84.4±24. 9)μmol/L; 72 h: (102.5±49.21 vs (91.1±38, 9), (87.2±26.0)μmol/L;both P〈0.05],and eGFR level was lower [24 h: (74.3±523.0) vs (84.4±29.0), (84.2±24.7)mL/(min. 1.73 m2); 72 h: (70.6±21.9) vs (80.1±27.7), (81.4±25.3)mL/(min ·1.73 m2 ) ;both P 〈0.05] in ARB group than those in ACEI and non-RASI group. In patients with normal renal function, the incidence rate of CI-AKI was higher in ARB group than non-RASI group (17. 1% vs 4. 5%, P〈0.05) ; While in patients with renal dysfunction, the incidence rate of CI-AKI was higher in ACEI group than non-RASI group (13.4% vs 6.7%, P〈0.05). Conclusion Treatment with ARBs before PCI increased the incidence rate of CI-AKI in patients with normal renal function, while for t
作者 余福玲 汪义云 谢泓 柴大军 苏津自 林金秀 彭峰 蔡洪斌 YU Fu-ling;WANG Yi-yun;XIE Hong;CHAI Da-jun;SU Jin-zi;LIN Jin-xiu;PENG Feng;Cai Hong-bin(Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou Fujian 350005, Chin)
出处 《中华高血压杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2017年第12期1163-1168,共6页 Chinese Journal of Hypertension
关键词 对比剂急性肾损害 血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂 血管紧张素受体拮抗剂 经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 contrast-induced acute kidney injury angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor angiotensin receptor blocker percutaneous coronary intervention
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献27

  • 1刘力生.2004年中国高血压防治指南(实用本)[J].中华心血管病杂志,2004,32(12):1060-1064. 被引量:2620
  • 2Toprak O, Cirit M, Bayata S, et al. The effect of pre-procedural captopril on contrast media induced nephropathy who underwent coronary angiography[J ]. Anadolu Kardiyol Derg, 2003,3 (2) : 98- 103. 被引量:1
  • 3Gupta RK, Kapoor A, Tewari S, et al. Captopril for preventing of contrast-induced nephropathy in diabetic patients: a randomized study[J]. Indian Heart J,1999,51(5):521-526. 被引量:1
  • 4Ma YC, Zuo L, Chen JH, et al. Modified glomerular filtration rate estimating equation for Chinese patients with chronic kidney disease[J]. Am Soe Nephrol, 2006,17 : 2937-2944. 被引量:1
  • 5McCullough PA. Contrast-induced acute kidney injury[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol,2008,51 (15) :1419-1428. 被引量:1
  • 6Darwish T. An evidence-based approach to minimise contrast-induced nephropathy[J]. N Z Med J ,2009,122(1299) :39-41. 被引量:1
  • 7Bagshaw SM, Culleton BF. Contrast-induced nephropathy: epidemiology and prevention[J]. Minerva Cardioangiol, 2006,54 ( 1 ) : 109-129. 被引量:1
  • 8Huxtable L, Raney CR, KheraGS. Should intravenous N-aeetyleystenine be considered standard of care for prevention of radio contrast-induced nephropathy? [J]. J Am Coil Cardiol,2003,42 (12):2169-2170. 被引量:1
  • 9Toprak O, Cirit M, Yesil M, etal. Metabolic syndrome as a risk factor for contrast-induced nephropathy in non-diabetic elderly patients with renal impairment[J]. Kidney Blood Press Res,2006,29 (1) :2-9. 被引量:1
  • 10Bruce RJ, Djamali A, Shink K, et al. Background fluctuation of kidney function versus contrast-induced nephrotoxicity[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol,2009,192(3) :711-718. 被引量:1

共引文献33

同被引文献49

引证文献4

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部