摘要
目的对比以问题为基础教学法(problem-based learning,PBL)与传统教学法在帕金森综合征鉴别诊断教学中的效果。方法将首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院神经病学中心神经变性疾病科轮转学员随机分成传统教学组和PBL组。所有学员教学前先接受对帕金森病及血管性帕金森综合征的熟悉度调查。传统教学组采用授课教学;PBL组以PBL教学法进行教学。教学结束后比较两组客观及主观教学指标成绩。结果教学前两组学员对帕金森病及血管性帕金森综合征熟悉度无差异。教学后PBL组教学主观和客观考核成绩均显著优于传统教学组,对教学过程的体验也显著优于传统教学组(均P<0.05)。结论引入PBL教学法能显著提高学员在学习帕金森病及血管性帕金森综合征鉴别中的获益。
Objective To compare the effect of problem-based learning（PBL） with the traditional method in teaching how to differentiate Parkinson＇s Disease（PD） and Vascular Parkinsonism（VPN）.Methods Based on randomized numbers, all the students were divided into 2 groups： traditional method group and PBL group.Results Before the teaching course, the familiarity for PD and VPN were tested in two groups and there was no statistic difference between the two groups. After the total course, the objective and subjective examination scores as well as the acceptance for the teaching in PBL group were all higher than that in traditional method group（All P 0.05）.Conclusion Students can gain more benefit from the teaching method of PBL in differentiating PD and VPN.
出处
《中国卒中杂志》
2017年第11期1070-1072,共3页
Chinese Journal of Stroke
基金
基金项目:北京脑科学研究之脑认知与脑医学-卒中后失眠综合干预模式对认知功能及卒中结局的影响研究(Z161100000216131)
关键词
帕金森综合征
帕金森病
鉴别诊断
基于问题学习法
Parkinsonism
Parkinson＇s Disease
Differential Diagnose
Problem-Based Leaming
