摘要
目的探讨对踝关节骨折以不同内固定方法进行治疗得到的临床效果。方法选择2014年3月—2017年4月曾在我院接受治疗的踝关节骨折患者120例,分为对照组与观察组,对照组中患者以切开复位内固定方法进行治疗,观察组中患者以闭合复位内固定方法治疗。结果经过手术治疗之后,观察组中患者手术优良率为91.7%,对照组中患者手术优良率为70.0%;观察两组患者手术指标,观察组各指标明显优于对照组;观察两组患者并发症,对照组并发症人数8例,观察组仅1例;差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对踝关节骨折分别以切开复位内固定与闭合复位内固定进行治疗均可取得一定临床效果,其中闭合复位内固定方式更加理想,可促进患者尽快康复。
]Objective To investigate the clinical effect of ankle fractures treated with different internal fixation methods. Methods From March 2014 to April 2017 in our hospital for treatment of 120 cases with ankle fractures were selected, they were divided into the control group and the observation group, the control group was treated with open reduction and internal fxation treatment, the observation group of patients were treated with closed reduction and fixation. Results After surgical treatment, the surgical excellent rate of the observation group was 91.7% and the control group patients in the surgical excellent rate was 70.0%; two groups were observed in patients with operation index, observation group was obviously better than the control group; the observation group of two patients with complications, complications in the control group were 8 cases, 1 cases of observation group; There were signifcant difference between two groups（P 〈 0.05）. Conclusion The ankle fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation with closed reduction and internal fixation can obtain certain clinical effects, including teaching closed reduction and internal fxation is more ideal, can promote the rehabilitation of patients as soon as possible, can choose the surgical treatment of ankle fracture.
出处
《中国卫生标准管理》
2017年第28期76-78,共3页
China Health Standard Management
