摘要
借助于"保护个体股东"与"控制决议合法"的主客观分析框架对股东会决议撤销诉讼分析,可知其现有定位为控制决议合法为主。但股东并非控制决议合法的适格主体。以股东作为原告,难以发挥维护决议适法的功能,且具有滥诉的风险。在保留股东为原告的前提下,对撤销诉讼以主观为主,客观为辅的定位校正,进而规则再造,是成本较为低廉的变革路径。若欲保留客观为主、主观为辅的功能定位,则需在公司之维下对撤销诉讼予以全面改造,充分回应团体诉讼的种种特性。
By introducing ＂protection of shareholder＇s rights and interests＂ and ＂ensuring the shareholders＂ meeting resolution legitimacy and accord with the article of association＂, which are the function of subjective and objective analysis framework, to analyze the revocable litigation of the shareholders＇ meeting resolution. We can draw a conclusion that the current functional orientation of this litigation is ＂ ensuring the shareholders＂ meeting resolution legitimacy and accord with the article of association＂. However, the shareholders are not the proper subject for the maintenance of the resolution. While shareholders as plaintiff, it is difficult to play the function of maintaining the resolution appropriate, and has the risk of indictment. In the premise of retaining the shareholders as the plaintiff, correct functional orientation and reengineering rule of revocable litigation, is a relatively low cost of change path. If we keep the current functional orientation, we need to revise the revocable litigation from the perspective of corporation, and fully respond to the various characteristics of group litigation.
出处
《法学论坛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第1期133-142,共10页
Legal Forum
基金
中国人民大学科学研究基金(中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助)项目"股权分离的裁判规则及理论重述"(17XNH011)的阶段性成果
关键词
决议撤销诉讼
功能定位
股东保护
团体诉讼
revocable litigation
functional orientation
perspective of company
group litigation
