期刊文献+

Comparison of Long-term Outcomes in Patients with Premature Triple-vessel Coronary Disease Undergoing Three Different Treatment Strategies: A Prospective Cohort Study 被引量:10

Comparison of Long-term Outcomes in Patients with Premature Triple-vessel Coronary Disease Undergoing Three Different Treatment Strategies: A Prospective Cohort Study
原文传递
导出
摘要 Background: Patients with premature triple-vessel disease (PTVD) have a higher risk of recurrent coronary events and repeat revascularization: however, the long-term outcome of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and medical therapy (MT) alone for PTVD patients is controversial. The aim of this study is to evaluate the long-term outcome of PTVD patients among these three treatment strategies, to find out the most appropriate treatment methods lbr these patients. Methods: One thousand seven hundred and ninety-two patients with PTVD (age: men 〈50 years and women _〈60 years) were enrolled between 2004 and 2011. The primary end point was all-cause death. The secondary end points were cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or repeat revascularization. Results: PCI, CABG, and MT alone were performed in 933 (52.1%), 459 (25.6%), and 400 (22.3%) patients. Both PCI and CABG were associated with lower all-cause death (4.6% vs. 4.1% vs. 15.5%, respectively, P 〈 0.01) and cardiac death (2.8% vs. 2.0% vs. 9.8%, respectively, P 〈 0.01 ) versus MT alone. The rate of repeat revascularization in the CABG group was significantly lower than those in the PCI and MT groups. After adjusting for baseline factors, PCI and CABG were still associated with similar lower risk of all-cause death and cardiac death versus MT alone (all-cause death: hazard ratio [HR]: 0.35, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.23-0.53, P 〈 0.01 and HR: 0.35, 95% CI: 0.18-0.70, P= 0.003, respectively, and cardiac death: HR: 0.32, 95% CI: 0.19-0.54, P〈 0.01 and HR: 0.36, 95% CI:0.14-0.93, P = 0.03, respectively). Conclusions: PCI and CABG provided equal long-term benefits for all-cause death and cardiac death for PTVD patients. Patients undergoing MT alone had the worst long-term clinical outcomes. Background: Patients with premature triple-vessel disease (PTVD) have a higher risk of recurrent coronary events and repeat revascularization: however, the long-term outcome of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and medical therapy (MT) alone for PTVD patients is controversial. The aim of this study is to evaluate the long-term outcome of PTVD patients among these three treatment strategies, to find out the most appropriate treatment methods lbr these patients. Methods: One thousand seven hundred and ninety-two patients with PTVD (age: men 〈50 years and women _〈60 years) were enrolled between 2004 and 2011. The primary end point was all-cause death. The secondary end points were cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or repeat revascularization. Results: PCI, CABG, and MT alone were performed in 933 (52.1%), 459 (25.6%), and 400 (22.3%) patients. Both PCI and CABG were associated with lower all-cause death (4.6% vs. 4.1% vs. 15.5%, respectively, P 〈 0.01) and cardiac death (2.8% vs. 2.0% vs. 9.8%, respectively, P 〈 0.01 ) versus MT alone. The rate of repeat revascularization in the CABG group was significantly lower than those in the PCI and MT groups. After adjusting for baseline factors, PCI and CABG were still associated with similar lower risk of all-cause death and cardiac death versus MT alone (all-cause death: hazard ratio [HR]: 0.35, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.23-0.53, P 〈 0.01 and HR: 0.35, 95% CI: 0.18-0.70, P= 0.003, respectively, and cardiac death: HR: 0.32, 95% CI: 0.19-0.54, P〈 0.01 and HR: 0.36, 95% CI:0.14-0.93, P = 0.03, respectively). Conclusions: PCI and CABG provided equal long-term benefits for all-cause death and cardiac death for PTVD patients. Patients undergoing MT alone had the worst long-term clinical outcomes.
出处 《Chinese Medical Journal》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2018年第1期1-9,共9页 中华医学杂志(英文版)
基金 This study was supported by grants from the CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (No. CAMS-12M, 2016-I2M-1-002), National Basic Research Program of China (No. 2010CB732601), National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (No. 2015AA020407), and National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81470380).
关键词 Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Medical Therapy: Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Premature Coronary Heart Disease Triple-vessel Coronary Disease Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Medical Therapy: Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Premature Coronary Heart Disease Triple-vessel Coronary Disease
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献20

  • 1Ryan TJ, Faxon DE Gunnar RM, Kennedy JW, King SB, Loop FD, et al. Guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. A report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association task force on assessment of diagnostic and therapeutic cardiovascular procedures (subcommittee on percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty). Circulation 1988; 78: 486-502. 被引量:1
  • 2Ellis SG, Vandormael MG, Cowley MJ, Whitlow PL, Schneider JP, Topol EJ. Coronary morphologic and clinical determinants of procedural outcome with angioplasty for multivessel coronary disease. Implications for patient selection. Multivessel Angioplasty Prognosis Study Group. Circulation 1990; 82:1193-1202. 被引量:1
  • 3Hamburger JN, Serruys PW, Scabra-Gomes R, Simon R, Koolen J J, Fleck E, et al. Recanalization of total coronary occlusions using a laser guidewire (the European TOTAL Surveillance Study). Am J Cardiol 1997; 80: 1419-1423. 被引量:1
  • 4Iwakura K, Ito H, Ikushima M, Okamura A, Asano K, Kuroda T, et al. Association between hyperglycemia and the no-reflow phenomenon in patients with acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 41: 1-7. 被引量:1
  • 5Lefevre T, Louvard Y, Morice MC, Dumas P, Loubeyre C, Benslimane A, et al. Stenting of bifurcation lesions: classification, treatments, and results. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2000; 49: 274-283. 被引量:1
  • 6Serruys PW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, Colombo A, Holmes DR, Mack MJ, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 2009; 360: 961-972. 被引量:1
  • 7Gyongyosi M, Christ G, Lang I, Kreiner G, Sochor H, Probst E et al. Two-year results of the AUTAX (Austrian Multivessel TAXUS-Stent) registry beyond the SYNTAX (synergy.between percutaneous coronary intervention with TAXUS and cardiac surgery) study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2009; 2: 718-727. 被引量:1
  • 8Smith SC Jr, Dove JT, Jacobs AK, Kennedy JW, Kereiakes D, Kern M J, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for percutaneous coronary intervention (revision of the 1993 PTCA guidelines)-executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (committee to revise the 1993 guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty) endorsed by the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. Circulation 2001; 103: 3019-3041. 被引量:1
  • 9Stettler C, Wandel S, Allemann S, Kastrati A, Morice MC, Schomig A, et al. Outcomes associated with drug-eluting and bare-metal stents: a collaborative network meta-analysis. Lancet 2007; 370: 937-948. 被引量:1
  • 10Kirtane A J, Gupta A, Iyengar S, Moses JW, Leon MB, Applegate R, et al. Safety and efficacy of drug-elating and bare metal stents: comprehensive meta-analysis of randomized trials and observational studies. Circulation 2009; 119: 3198-3206. 被引量:1

共引文献17

同被引文献64

引证文献10

二级引证文献39

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部