摘要
民法中关于权利设定的一般规范是侵权受害人提出损害救济的依据和基础,传统侵权法之保护范围仅限于既存法律体系所承认之权利,现代侵权法虽不作此限,但损害客体仍以法定权利为主。侵害法定权利者所引发之不利后果当属损害无疑,其无须附加违法性等要件,权利受到侵害即含示违法性之存在。然而即使是作为损害客体的权利本身,亦随着侵权法受害人中心主义的发展,呈现逐步扩大之势,其主要表现为民事权利种类丰富所带来的损害客体扩充、特定权利内涵之扩大解释引发的损害客体扩展以及人格权商品化趋势下的损害客体扩张。
The general norm of right setting in civil law is the basis and foundation of tort- injured party~ damage relief. The protection scope of traditional tort law is limited to the rights recognized by existed legal system. Although the modern tort law does not make this limit, the object of damage still gives priority to legal rights. The adverse consequences caused by infringement of legal rights belong to damage range undoubtedly, which does not need any additional requirements such as illegality, and the infringements of right declare the existence of illegality. However, along with the development of injured party centralismsn tort law, even right as the object of damage per se has also been expanded gradually on the whole. It is mainly manifested as the expansion of damage object caused by enrichment of civil rights type, extended interpretation of specific rights and commercialization of personality rights.
出处
《河北法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第1期53-66,共14页
Hebei Law Science
关键词
侵权法
受害人中心主义
权利
损害客体
扩展
tort law
injured party centralism
right
the object of damage
extension
