摘要
检察官审讯环节属于审查起诉中查清事实真相的重要组成部分,但讯问中往往以"是否认罪"的语词开场,暴露出检察官在审讯前"有罪推定"的倾向。审讯中"认罪"修辞的应用主要以其模糊语义、反问、逻辑三段论的引出功能获取有罪供述,但容易忽视"认罪"的自愿性和可靠性;同时应用该种修辞与审查起诉讯问目的、定罪规律、讯问规则等刑事诉讼基本理论产生冲突。检察官应当放弃功利主义,坚持疑罪从无,认清审讯中法律修辞应用的正确进路。
The prosecutors interrogation is an important part of examination and prosecution to find out the truth,but the interrogation always starts with the term “whether to plead guilty” , which reveals the prosecutors＂tendency of “presumption of guilt” before the trial. In the interrogation, the application of “ confession” rhguilty plea mainly through the elicited function of fuzzy semantics , rhetorical questions , and logic , bignore the voluntary and reliability of “ confession” ; in addition, the use of such rhetoric will conflict with the basic theories of criminal litigation , such as the purpose of interrogation of examination and prosecution , the law of conviction ,the rules of interrogation and so on. Prosecutors should give up utilitarianism, insist on no punishment indoubtful cases,and make clear the correct approach to the application of legal rhetoric in the interrogation
出处
《山西省政法管理干部学院学报》
2018年第1期28-31,共4页
Journal of Shanxi Politics and Law Institute for Administrators
关键词
审查起诉
审讯
认罪
法律修辞学
examination and prosecution
interrogation
confession
legal rhetoric
