摘要
我国政府信息公开制度设置了行政复议和行政诉讼两种审查救济方式。公开数据显示首选行政复议的公众只有三成左右,而选择行政诉讼的胜诉率也不到30%,行政复议和行政诉讼的公信力和可信度遭受质疑。本文以中国裁判文书网公开的政府信息诉讼案件为数据来源,分析了我国政府信息公开行政复议、司法审查机制的现实困境,但重在剖析行政复议的权重,提出在制度设计和实践依赖角度上我国更应该重视行政复议的力度。
There are two methods supplying in the Regulations of the People＇s Republic of China on the disclosure of government information for protecting Public＇s Right to Know： Administrative Procedures and Legal Remedies. But according to the open data, there are about thirty percent people would choose Administrative Review method, and only 30% people succeed in China＇s Administrative Procedural. The credibility and reliability of both methods is poor. This article analyses the current situation and give more attention to the Administrative Review method, and concludes that we should attach much weight to the Administrative Review system in the perfecting regulation design and practice chosen.
出处
《档案管理》
北大核心
2018年第1期47-49,共3页
Archives Management
关键词
政府信息公开
行政复议
司法审查
权重
Government Information Disclosure
Administrative Review
Administrative Procedural
Weight Selecting
