摘要
物权刑民交叉保护的行为定性是司法实践中的难题。依托刑民管控措施的强弱程度,介入有权占有和无权占有的区分,借助行为善恶两性的甄别均无法洞见其价值基础,仅是停留刑民规范外部特征的随性抉择。溯源刑法惩罚的正当性,物权刑民交叉保护的行为定性应当以公众意愿为基础,申彰刑法管控的不得已,强调物权保护的刑法适用是穷尽民法调整手段,他法管控措施之后的无奈之举,揭示刑法惩罚的正当性源自侵权人控制自己的行为往刑法保护利益相悖方向发展的罪恶意志和危险人格,明晰侵权人罪过的有无是物权刑民交叉保护的刑民分野,罪过的内容及其实现程度是决定犯罪的性质、形态及其刑罚轻重的根据。即物权刑民交叉保护应坚守罪过定性的底线,在确属二次违法,且恶意侵权,他法无力的基础上,依据行为人的罪过内容予以刑民区分。
it is a difficult problem in the judicial practice to define the behavior of the cross protection of property right and people＇s rights. To explore the legitimacy of criminal punishment, the qualitative behavior of criminal and civil cross-protection of property rights should be based on the wishes of the public. That the criminal law emphasizes the property right protection is to limit the adjustment of civil law means, because it lack of other control measures, which reveals the legitimacy of criminal punishment from evil and dangerous personality. The cross boundary protection of the criminal law of the real right should adhere to the bottom line of the qualitative determination of the crime, and distinguish between the criminal and the civil crimes according to the content of the perpetrator＇s crime in the case of two violations of the law and malicious infringement.
出处
《江西科技师范大学学报》
2017年第5期63-71,共9页
Journal of Jiangxi Science & Technology Normal University
关键词
物权
刑民交叉
人权
罪过
real right
criminal and civil cross
human rights
crime
