摘要
目的:观察沐舒坦不同雾化方式吸入治疗慢性支气管炎急性发作的疗效。方法:86例分为两组,对照组42例用空气压缩泵驱动雾化吸入方式,实验组44例用氧驱动雾化方式吸入。结果:总有效率实验组100%、对照组88.09%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。实验组不良反应发生率低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:沐舒坦氧驱动雾化吸入治疗慢性支气管炎急性发作效果更好。
Objective： To observe the curative ettect oi inhalation of mucosola m treating chronic bronchitis acute episode. Method： 86 cases were randomly divided into two groups.42 cases were treated by air compressor pump atomizing inhalation as the control group while 44 cases were inhaled by oxygen-driven atomization as the experimental group. Result： The total effective rate of the experimental group was 100% while that of the control group was 88.09%. There was statistical significance between the two groups （P〈0.05） .The incidence of adverse reaction in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group （P〈0.05） . Conclusion： Oxygen-driven atomization inhalation is more effective in treating acute episode with chronic bronchitis.
出处
《实用中医药杂志》
2017年第12期1448-1449,共2页
Journal of Practical Traditional Chinese Medicine
关键词
慢性支气管炎急性发作
沐舒坦
空气压缩泵雾化吸入
氧驱动雾化吸入
acute episode of chronic bronchitis
mucosutan
air compression pump atomization inhalation
oxygendrive atomization inhalation
