期刊文献+

金融科技的监管模式选择与优化路径研究——兼对监管沙箱模式的反思 被引量:33

The Choice of Regulatory Models and the Optimal Path of Financial Technology: a Reconsideration of the Regulatory Sandbox
下载PDF
导出
摘要 金融科技正在推动金融变革,并给金融监管带来挑战。为此,各国监管者基于本国的实践和自身能力不断探索适合自己的监管方案,从而在促进创新的同时降低风险。按照监管严厉程度,各国金融科技的监管模式可划分为五种类型:"自由放任"型、"个案分析"型、"试验主义"型(包括监管沙箱)、"量体裁衣"型和"削足适履"型。这五种类型的监管均利、弊共存,即使备受推崇的监管沙箱也不例外。监管沙箱目前的实践范围和规模均有限,有些制度设计只是披着监管沙箱的"外衣",其实质与传统监管路径并无二致,且"试点"等其他"试验主义"监管作为监管沙箱的替代路径也值得探讨。在此基础上,本文认为借助监管科技,构建与金融科技发展阶段和风险程度相匹配的递进性监管包容制度,是有效平衡金融科技创新与风险的有效监管路径。 Financial Technology (FinTech) is transforming the financial system and posing challenges to financial regulations. Aiming to promote financial innovations while reduce the risks, international regulators continuously explore suitable regulatory models based on practices and abilities. The regulatory models can be summarized into five types according to the severity of supervision, namely "Laissez-faire" regulation; Case- based regulation; Experimental regulation including Regulatory Sandboxes (RS); "Tailor-made" regulation; and "Cautious Fit" regulation. The well-respected RS has its pros and cons, such as the scope and scale of practice are limited. Some claims the SR are just regular regulations in disguise. This paper proposes to build a progressive regulatory system, which matches the development stage of the risk level of FinTech with the help of regulatory technology (RegTech).
作者 李敏
机构地区 北京大学法学院
出处 《金融监管研究》 2017年第11期21-37,共17页 Financial Regulation Research
关键词 金融科技 监管沙箱 伞型沙箱 监管科技 FinTech Regulatory Sandbox Umbrella Sandbox RegTech
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献34

  • 1潘功胜.认真总结推广经验 扎实推进区域金融改革创新[J].南方金融,2014(12):4-5. 被引量:13
  • 2纳特·西尔弗,信号与噪音(中文版),2013年,中信出版社. 被引量:1
  • 3人民银行、银监会等,关于促进互联网金融健康发展的指导意见,Ⅵ删.pbc.gov.cn,2015年7月. 被引量:1
  • 4银监会等,网络借贷信息中介机构业务活动管理暂行办法,www.cbrc.gov.cn,2016年8月. 被引量:1
  • 5Branson, M., The Digitalization of Finance: Opportunities and Risks from a Supervisory Perspective, Speech at the DNB International Conference for Financial Sector Supervisors, Amsterdam, 14 June 2016. 被引量:1
  • 6Chaffee, E., and G. Rapp, Regulating On-Line Peer-to-Peer Lending in the Aftermath of Dodd-Frank: In Search of an Evolving Regulatory Regime for an Evolving Industry, Washington & Lee Law Review, 2012, 69(2), 485-533. 被引量:1
  • 7Citi, Digital Disruption: How FinTech is Forcing Banking to a Tipping Point, Research Report, March 2016. 被引量:1
  • 8CPMI, Payment aspects of financial inclusion, Research Report, April 2016. 被引量:1
  • 9DeNederlandsche Bank, Technological Innovation and the Dutch Financial Sector, Research Report, 2016. 被引量:1
  • 10FCA, The FCA's Regulatory Approach to Crowdfunding over the Internet, and the Promotion of Non- readily Realisable Securities by other Media, www.fca.org.uk/, March 2014. 被引量:1

共引文献379

同被引文献412

引证文献33

二级引证文献341

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部