摘要
在过往的诉讼标的理论研究中,大多数研究成果都使用了"体系性诉讼标的理论"作为研究范式,相关研究通常把"体系性"的研究范式默认为德国、日本等主要大陆法国家理论的通行做法。但是,当代日本法的理论和实务已经放弃了"体系性诉讼标的理论",并转而将诉讼标的问题拆解成诉的合并、诉的变更、禁止重复系属、既判力的客观范围等四个子问题,在具体的诉讼场景中分别寻求妥当的解决方案。日本民事诉讼法学的哲学观是一种重视具体场景中结果妥当性的形而下哲学观。理解这种诉讼法哲学观,不仅有助于重新认识日本诉讼标的理论,还可为理解当今的整个日本民事诉讼法学提供视角。
Among the past researches on theory of subject matter of dispute, most accomplishments were using ＂ Systematic Subject Matter of Dispute Theory＂ as research pattern, and in the relevant researches, it is usually considered that the research pattern of ＂systematicness＂ was commonly carried out by major practicing countries of civil law such as Germany and Japan. However, this article maintains the point that in the contemporary theories and practices of law of Japan, the pattern of ＂ Systematic Subject Matter of Dispute Theory＂ has no longer been employed, instead issues related to subject matter of dispute have been broken down into four sub-categories of claim and party joinder, claim alteration, lis pendens,res judicata, and proper solution plan was sought out in each specific case. The philosophical perspective of Civil Procedure Law of Japan is the kind that emphasizes on the appropriateness of result in each specific case. By understanding this philosophical concept of Civil Procedure Law of Japan, not only we could renew our understanding towards the theory of Subject Matter of Dispute of Japan, but also obtain new perspec- tives for understanding the entire Civil Procedure Law of Japan.
出处
《法学论坛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第6期82-91,共10页
Legal Forum
基金
司法部中青年项目"新范式下的民事诉讼标的理论研究"(16SFB3026)的阶段性成果
关键词
诉讼标的
“相对化”研究范式
诉讼法哲学观
既判力
subject-matter of dispute
relative theory of subject-matter of dispute
philosophical concept for civil procedure law
res judicata
