摘要
就马克思早期思想演变的逻辑而言,私有财产批判应当被理解为他从1843年起渐次展开的国家批判、市民社会批判的最终归宿,从而导向马克思从黑格尔那里继承下来的国家与市民社会分离问题的最终解决。私有财产的本质系于资本与劳动的矛盾关系,基于这样的认识,私有财产批判在马克思随后的理论工作中让位于资本批判。但是,如果没有《莱茵报》时期的物质利益困惑,马克思就不会转向对黑格尔法哲学的研究从而走向私有财产批判。另一方面,这种私有财产批判的理论前提在于破除对于私有财产的政治的、法的理解,而将私有财产视作是经济关系,只有这样,才可能从物质生产入手去寻找私有财产的根据与限度。
The critique of private property should be understood as the final result of national criticism and civil society criticism from 1843. Private property criticism in Marx＇s subsequent theoretical work gives way to capital criticism. However, without material interest confusion in the period of the Reynolds period, Marx would not turn to the study of Hegel＇s philosophy of law and thus to the criticism of private property. On the other hand, the theoretical premise of private property criticism is that private property is understood as economical relations,only in this way can it be possible to understand the grounds and limit of private property from the point of view of material production.
出处
《学术月刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第11期28-33,共6页
Academic Monthly
关键词
私有财产
长子继承权
生产关系
物质利益
市民社会
private property, relations of production, production relation, material interests, civil society
