期刊文献+

植物学“营养网络”实验管理方法研究

A Study on Methodology of Experimental Management of Botanical ‘Nutrient Network'
下载PDF
导出
摘要 植物学研究不仅历史悠久,而且对于当前生态学研究意义重大。作为最佳研究手段的野外实验,现有的方法存在不具有普遍性和伪重复的风险,且时间、人力和成本上无法负担,需要采取"全球多(站)点野外实验"的新思路。因为具体解决了明确的科学目标和问题、拥有关键团体、可辨识的处理和采样、简单和不昂贵的设计、良好的数据管理计划、确保参与科学家的明确收益以及为额外的研究预留空间等7个要素,营养网络及其提出的分布式协作实验(协议)获得成功,但也存在站点类型和实验设计的限制、周期的伪重复和范围的局限的不足。 The botanical research has the long history and is of great significance to current study of ecology and global issues.As the best research way,current method of field experiment takes the risk of nonuniversality and pseudoreplication,and furthermore,it cannot burden the consumptions of time,human resource and cost.Thus,the new approach of global multisites field experiments(GMFEs)becomes a necessity.Nutrient Network’(NutNet)and distributed collaboration experiments(DCEs)(protocol),proposed by NutNet,have achieved success because of its 7 keys of developing clear scientific goals and questions,owning key group,identical treatments and sampling,simple and inexpensive design,good plan for data management,ensuring clear benefits for participating scientists and reserving room for additional studies.Meanwhile,the new approach has the shortages of limitation of type of sites and design of experiment,pseudoreplication of period and confinement of range.
作者 李际
出处 《技术与创新管理》 2017年第6期678-684,共7页 Technology and Innovation Management
关键词 植物学 营养网络 分布式协作实验 全球多(站)点野外实验 botany;Nutrient Network(NutNet);distributed collaboration experiments(DCEs);global multisites field experiments(GMFEs)
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献59

  • 1王健,孙丹娜.假设检验中原假设的选取问题[J].山东理工大学学报(自然科学版),2005,19(3):89-91. 被引量:3
  • 2陈光蓉.关于参数假设检验中零假设的选择[J].重庆工学院学报,2006,20(5):122-125. 被引量:3
  • 3彭光华,孙振钧,吴文良.生态科学的内涵、本质与作用——纪念生态科学创立140年[J].自然辩证法通讯,2007,29(1):53-59. 被引量:13
  • 4Roughgarden J. Is there a general theory of community ecology? Biology and Philosophy, 2009, 24:521-529. 被引量:1
  • 5Jaeschke A, Bittner T, Jentsch A, et al. The last dec- ade in ecological climate change impact research: Where are we now? Naturwissenschafien, 2014, 101:1-9. 被引量:1
  • 6Sax F, Stachowicz J, Brown H, et al. Ecological and evolutionary insights from species invasions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 2007, 22:445-470. 被引量:1
  • 7Brooker R, Maestre T, Callaway RM, et al. Facilitation in plant communities: The past, the present, and the future. Journal of Ecology, 2008, 96 : 18- 34. 被引量:1
  • 8Fraser L, Henry H, Carlyle C, et al. Coordinated dis- tributed experiments: An emerging tool for testing global hypotheses in ecology and environmental science. Fron- tiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2013, 11: 147- 155. 被引量:1
  • 9Scheiner S, Gurevitch J. Trans: Mou F-Z(牟傅主).Design and Analysis of Ecological Experiment. 2nd Ed. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2000 (in Chinese). 被引量:1
  • 10Fridley J, Stachowicz J, Naeem S, et al. The invasion paradox: Reconciling pattern and process in species in- vasions. Ecology, 2007, 88:3-17. 被引量:1

共引文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部