摘要
证明妨碍法律规则应适用"公平"与"制裁"多元法理基准,以证明妨碍行为人在本证中是否负证明责任。对于负证明责任的当事人,无其他替代证据证明反证事实的情形,证明妨碍法律规则应采取"证据排除"模式。有其他替代证据的情形,若该替代证据证明力高,令证明妨碍方承担额外费用,亦可施以强制措施或刑事制裁;若该替代证据证明力低,法院可根据妨碍方主观可归责性高低,做出不同程度的"真实"认定。对于不负证明责任的当事人,通过三阶段证明妨碍法律规则体系进行有效规制,先降低被妨碍方证明标准,再以此标准形成法官暂定心证,最后将证明责任转换给妨碍方。
It is proved that the law rules should be applied in the plural legal principle of ＂fairness＂and＂sanction＂to prove whether the obstructing act holder has the burden of proof as the standard of classification in this document：proof of legal rules hinder the re design of the system to bear the burden of proof of the parties,in case no other alternative evidence in rebuttal the rule of law,obstruction of evidence should adopt the＂exclusionary＂mode.There are other alternative evidence,if the replacement of evidence,to prove the interfering party to bear the additional costs,or impose compulsory measures or criminal sanctions;if the alternative evidence is low,the court may hinder the party according to the liability of subjective level,make different levels of the ＂true＂identification.For those parties who do not bear the burden of proof,the obstruction of the rule of law system can be effectively regulated through the construction of the three stages of ＂proving the standard of the impaired party,lowering the judge’s tentative proof of the heart and changing the burden of proof＂.
出处
《河南财经政法大学学报》
2017年第6期151-158,共8页
Journal of Henan University of Economics and Law
关键词
证明妨碍
法理基准
法律规则
制度设计重构
proof of obstruction
legal basis
legal rules
system design reconstruction
