摘要
目的比较舒芬太尼、瑞芬太尼在急诊脑外伤手术麻醉中的应用效果。方法随机选取本院2013年4月至2016年7月的22例急诊脑外伤手术患者作为试验组,采用舒芬太尼进行麻醉处理;选取同期收治的22例急诊脑外伤手术患者作为对照组,采用瑞芬太尼行麻醉处理,比较两组患者的麻醉效果。结果试验组麻醉持续时间、自主呼吸恢复时间、拔管时间、VAS疼痛评分等均优于对照组;试验组麻醉风险事件发生率(13.64%)低于对照组(40.91%),两组的麻醉效果比较,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论与瑞芬太尼相比,舒芬太尼更具使用优势,可作为急诊脑外伤手术首选麻醉药物,建议临床推广应用。
Objective To compare the applicalion effecl of sufenlanil and remifenlanil in emergency anesthesia for brain injury. Methods Twenly-lwo cases of emergency palienls wilh brain lrauma surgery were randomly selecled from April 2013 lo July 2016 as lhe experimenlal group, which using sufenlanil aneslhesia. Twenly-lwo cases of emergency palienls wilh brain lrauma surgery were selecled as lhe conlrol group, which using remifenlanil aneslhesia. The aneslhelic effecls of lhe lwo groups were compared. Results The duralion of aneslhesia, sponlaneous brealhing recovery lime, exlubalion lime, VAS pain scores in lhe experimenlal group were beller lhan lhe conlrol group （ P〈0.05）, and lhe incidence of aneslhesia risk evenls in lhe experimenlal group （13.64%） waslower lhan lhal in lhe conlrol group （40.91%）. Compare lhe aneslhesia effecl oflwo groups, lhe difference was slalislically significanl （ P〈0.05）. Conclusion Compared wilh remifenlanil, sufenlanil has more advanlages, which can be used as emergency brain lrauma surgery preferred aneslhelic drugs. Ilis recommended for clinical applicalion.
作者
张春龙
ZHANG Chun-long(Qishan Counly Hospilal in Shannxi Province, Baoji 722400, Chin)
出处
《临床医学研究与实践》
2017年第5期54-55,共2页
Clinical Research and Practice
