摘要
关于帮助犯的处罚根据,修正的惹起说因为以从属性理论为前提,将促进法益的侵害作为帮助犯的处罚根据而具有合理性。对帮助犯的限制应从形式与实质两方面入手。从形式上来说,帮助正犯、组织犯、间接正犯都是帮助正犯,因而都是帮助犯;帮助帮助犯是间接帮助,也是帮助犯;而帮助教唆犯的实质是教唆犯,因而不是帮助犯。从实质上来看,要考虑帮助的程度,对此应作类型化的分析。对日常经营行为是否具有帮助犯的可罚性,应从正犯行为的紧迫性、行为对法益侵害的作用大小、行为人对法益的保护义务和行为人对正犯行为的确实性认识等方面入手进行分析判断。
When it comes to the punishment foundation for abettors, the modified provoking theory, due to its premise of subordination theory, takes the violation of lawful right as the foundation of punishment, which makes it reasonable. To make the abettors constraint should consider both form and nature. In terms of form, abettors include auxiliary accomplice, organizers, and indirect parties. Those who assist the auxiliary accomplice are also abettors while those who help instigators are in nature instigators rather than abettors. In terms of nature, the degree of aiding should also be considered and the analysis of category should also be included. Whether daily business operations have the potential of abettor should consider from multiple perspectives.
出处
《哈尔滨学院学报》
2017年第11期65-71,共7页
Journal of Harbin University
关键词
帮助犯
成立范围
处罚界限
共犯
正犯
abettors
the range
punishment boundaries
accomplice
principle offenders
