摘要
"中立性"既是中立帮助行为之特质,也是确定行为可罚性的事实根据。基于行为"中立性"的本质特征以及维持刑法自由保障机能与法益保护机能动态平衡的客观需求,即便中立帮助行为对他人实施犯罪具有事实性或物理性因果贡献,也不应无差别地全面肯定其刑事可罚性。然而,限制行为可罚性的既有路径不是限制逻辑存在明显瑕疵,就是限制标准过于暧昧、限制结论过于恣意,不具备相应的操作性和可行性,根本无法担负起限定处罚范围的重任。确定中立帮助行为刑事可罚性,应当立足行为之"客观中立性"特征,通过演绎客观归责理论,规范评价行为升高正犯实行犯罪的风险是否为法所不允许。只有在违反相关刑法前规范升高正犯行为之风险且该规范之目的在于避免行为被用于犯罪时,才应肯定中立帮助行为的刑事可罚性。
'Neutrality'is not only the traits of neutral helping behavior,but also the fact foundation in judging the accountability. Based on the objective demand of 'neutrality'and the dynamic balance between the function of protecting freedom and protecting law- interests,even if the neutral helping behavior has factual or physical cause and effect contribution to others' crimes,it should not be fully affirmed its criminal accountability. However,the existed paths to limit the accountability cannot bear the burden of restricting punishment scope because their logic is obviously improper or their standards are too ambiguous. The criminal accountability should lay its foundation onto the 'objective characteristics'and normatively evaluate whether the higher risk of offender commits a crime is disallowed.Only when the behavior raises the risk by violating the law other than criminal law that is aimed at avoiding crime,can the criminal accountability be admitted.
出处
《国家检察官学院学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第6期107-121,共15页
Journal of National Prosecutors College
基金
中国人民大学2015年度拔尖创新人才培育资助计划成果
关键词
中立帮助行为
刑事可罚性
中立性
限制处罚
客观归责理论
Neutral Helping Behavior
Criminal Accountability
Neutrality
Limited Punishment
Objective Imputation
