摘要
"法律融贯论"一词具有多义性和模糊性。从类型学上看,法律融贯论至少可分为认识性法律融贯论、构成性法律融贯论、整全性法律融贯论三种。认识性法律融贯论是一种关于法律知识的证成理论;构成性法律融贯论是一种关于法律本质以及正确裁判的理论;整全性法律融贯论则是一种关于法律知识最优证成理论的广义融贯论。从真理论的角度看,认识性法律融贯论属于真理证成计划,构成性法律融贯论属于真理形而上学计划,而整全性法律融贯论则对认识性法律融贯论的真理论价值给予元理论说明。三种融贯论互不具有可替代性。
The terminology legal coherentism is ambiguous and vague. From the perspective of typology, there are at least three kinds of legal coherentism, namely, legal epistemic coherentism, legal constitutivecoherentism and legal integrated coherentism. The epistemic one is a justification theory of legal knowledge, the constitutive one is a theory about the nature of law and correctness of adjudication. Meanwhile, asa broad coherentism, the integrated one is an optimal justification theory of legal knowledge. From the perspectiveof theories of truth, the epistemic one belongs to the justification project, the constitutive one belongsto the metaphysical project, and the integrated one provides a meta - theoretical elucidation for thevalue of theories of truth of the epistemic one. These three kinds of theories are not mutually substitutable.
出处
《北方法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第6期93-103,共11页
Northern Legal Science
基金
深圳大学青年扶持项目"法哲学视域下的法律可废止性和不可废止性研究"(2017QNFC66)
国家社科基金重点项目"全面推进依法治国的逻辑理性根基研究"(13AXZ0017)的研究成果
