期刊文献+

行使自卫权跨境打击恐怖主义的法律问题研究

Study on Legal Problems concerning Cross-Border Anti-Terrorism Attack as Performance of Self-defense
下载PDF
导出
摘要 《联合国宪章》第51条确认了联合国会员国在受到武力攻击时得以行使自卫权的固有权利。然而,恐怖袭击是否构成上述规定所称的"武力攻击",国家是否可以基于对自卫权的行使而对恐怖主义进行跨境打击,在国际社会尚未形成定论。对此,应当认识到,恐怖袭击构成"武力攻击"须满足如下两个条件:第一,恐怖袭击已经发生并且达到了"武力攻击"的规模和后果;第二,恐怖袭击是可归因于国家或交战团体的行为。而倘若恐怖袭击无法归因于一国或交战团体,那么相应的恐怖袭击发动者则难以成为国家通过行使自卫权进行打击的对象。 Article 51 of the UN Charter clearly states its member countries enjoy the inherent right of self-defense if an armed-attack occurs. However, the international community has not given a definite answer to whether the terrorist attacks constitute the "armed attack" under Article 51 of the UN Charter. Accordingly, it should be noted that whether terrorist attacks constitute an "armed attack" should meet the following two conditions: 1. terrorist attacks have occurred and reached the scale and consequences of "armed attack"; 2. the terrorist attacks can be attributed to a state or belligerent-community behavior. If the terrorist attacks are difficult to attribute to a state or a belligerent community, terrorist attackers are hard to become the targets of a country's exercise of the fight of self-defense.
作者 翟仲
机构地区 华东政法大学
出处 《公安理论与实践(上海公安高等专科学校学报)》 2017年第5期61-69,共9页 Journal of Shanghai Police College
关键词 自卫权 跨境打击 恐怖主义 武力攻击 Right of Self-Defense Cross-border Combat Terrorism Armed Attack
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献23

  • 1Gregory M Travalio, Terrorism, International Law, and the Use of Military Force, 18 Wisconsin International Law Journal 175 (2000). 被引量:1
  • 2Oscar Schachter, The Lawful Use of Force by a State Against Terrorists in Another Country, in Henry H Han, Terrorism and Political Violence, 1993, p.2.50. 被引量:1
  • 3Roealyn Higgins, Problems and Process: International Law and How We Use It, 1994, p.250. 被引量:1
  • 4Francis A Boyle, Military Responses to Terrorism: Remarks of Francis A Boyle, 81 Proceedings of the American Society of International Law 288 (1987). 被引量:1
  • 5Walter Laqueur, Postmodern Terrorism, Foreign Affairs, SEP/OCT 1996. 被引量:1
  • 6Angus Martyn, The Right of self-Defence Under International Law.the Response To The Terrorist Attacks of 11 September,资料来源:网址http://www.aph.gov.au/library/pubs/CIB/2001-02/02cih08.htm # doctrine,2003年 5 月12日访问. 被引量:1
  • 7Giorgio Gaja,In What Sense Was There An Armed Attack? 资料来源:网址: http://www.ejil.org/forum-WTC/ny-gaja.html,2003年10月4日访问. 被引量:1
  • 8Smart G Baker, Comparing the 1993 U S Airstrike on Iraq to the 1986 Bombing of Libya : the New Interpretation of Article 51. 24 The Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law 113( 1994). 被引量:1
  • 9Michael N Schmitt, Counter-Terrorism and Use of Force in International Law, The Marshall Center Papers, No. 5, pp67-68. 参见网址 http ://www. marshallcenter.org/site-graphic/lang-en/page-coll-mcp- 1. 被引量:1
  • 10Mary Ellen O' Connell, Lawful Self-Defense To Terrorism ,63 U Pitt L Rev. 889. 被引量:1

共引文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部