摘要
船舶抵押权涉及多个法律的交叉,应当从解释论的角度,探讨船舶抵押权的适用问题。在抵押权行使的条件方面,应当认为《海商法》立法技术滞后,补充适用《物权法》规定的当事人约定抵押权实现的情形。在船舶抵押关系的主体方面,应当包括《物权法》所规定的第三人作为船舶抵押人。船舶抵押权的行使方式方面,应当适用《海商法》结合部分《物权法》的规定,允许请求法院拍卖、变卖两种行使方式。在物上代位权和涤除权方面,应当适用《物权法》的相关规定。
This article mainly deals with the applicable law of ship mortgage. In view of the conditions on enforcement of ship mortgage, the legislative techniques of Maritime Law can be considered stagnant, and the relevant prescriptions in Property Law which deals with the conditions agreed by parties to exercise ship mortgage can be applied. As to the subjects in the relationships of ship mortgage, the prescriptions in Property Law can be applied which includesthe third party as a ship mortgagor. As far as the methods to enforcement ship mortgage, Maritime Law combined with Property Law shall be applied, which states that ship mortgagee shall apply to the courts for auction and bargain. When it comes to real subrogation of mortgage and elimination right, the Property Law shall be applied.
出处
《广东开放大学学报》
2017年第5期72-77,共6页
JOURNAL OF GUANGDONG OPEN UNIVERSITY
关键词
海商法
物权法
担保法
船舶抵押权
maritime law
property law
guarantee law
ship mortgage
