摘要
立法类型和司法罪名都有调整的必要,类罪名标示了个罪法益的最大边界,类罪名之间、类罪名与个罪名的关系混乱。章罪名过于凌乱,多重分类和僵硬归类并不鲜见。个别节罪名随着个罪的删除也丧失了存在的必要。个罪名法益与类罪名法益冲突时,个罪名的归类错误就会凸显,这会对个罪名和类罪名造成双重损害,有必要重新调整个罪归类。依据一条(款)一罪名和行为类型,考虑到选择性罪名也可并罚,有些罪名应合并为一罪。同样,有些个罪需要拆分为数个罪名。在立法痴迷于增设新罪名的当下,更为迫切的问题是对于竞合的罪名、无效罪名、无害罪名的大力除罪化。
The types of legislation and judicial charges are necessary for adjustment, category charge indicates the maximum boundary of the legal benefit of a crime, and there is confusion about the relation between the category charges and the relation between the category charges and charges. Category charges are too messy, multiple classifications and stiff classifications are not uncommon. Some section charges with deletion of individual crimes also lost the necessity of existence. When there is a conflict between the legal interests of the crimes and the legal interests of category charges, the classification errors of the charges will be highlighted, which will cause double damage to the crimes and category charges, and it is necessary to readjust the classification of crimes. On the basis of one article （section） one charge and behavior type, taking into account the selective charges can be combined, some number of charges should be merged into one charge. In the same way, some charge need to be divided into several charges. When legislation is obsessed with the stipulation of new crimes, the more pressing issue is the vigorous abolition of competing offenses, invalid charges, and innocent charges.
出处
《时代法学》
2017年第5期3-13,共11页
Presentday Law Science
关键词
类罪名
贪污贿赂罪
公共安全
一条(款)一罪名
除罪化
category charges
crimes of corruption and bribery
public security
one article （section） one charge
decriminalization
