摘要
"连成贤诉臧树林"案涉及到不动产登记和占有的对抗问题。二审判决和《最高人民法院公报》的判决要旨本质上要将原权利人的占有作为限制登记簿公信力的客观事由,它类似于英国法上的"附实际控制的利益可以对抗登记物权"规则。不过,这个规则并非意味着简单的占有就可以对抗登记,而且英国法的发展趋势是完全消除占有对登记的限制效力。因此,我国未来的立法和司法不应吸收这个规则,单独占有不能直接成为阻却第三人善意取得的事由,也不能限制登记簿的公信力。从法教义学的角度来说,二审判决和《最高人民法院公报》的判决要旨都存在问题。本案也不能类推适用"买卖不破租赁"规则,解决租赁权"尴尬"地位的一个方法就是承认其物权性,要求长期租赁必须登记。
The ＂Lian Chenxian v. Zang Shulin＂ case involves the conflict between possession and registration of immovables. The second trial＇s judgement and the opinion in the Gazette of the Supreme People＇s Court treated possession as an objective factor restricting the public faith of registration, which resembles the rule of ＂interests of persons in actual occupation can override registration＂ in English law. However, the rule is not applied without limitation, and the tendency is that the effect of restriction of possession will be totally abolished in the future English law. Therefore, the rule should not be accepted in Chinese legislation and justice. The possession should not be seen as a cause of denying bona fide acquisition. According to dogmatic analysis, both the second trial＇s judgement and the opinion in the Gazette of the Supreme People＇s Court lack a sound legal basis. The rule of ＂sale does not break lease＂ cannot be applied in this case. One possible solution to resolve the dilemma of lease is to recognize its proprietary effect and registrability.
出处
《苏州大学学报（法学版）》
2017年第3期67-79,共13页
Journal of Soochow University：Law Edition
关键词
不动产占有
不动产登记
占有推定知情
买卖不破租赁
Possession of Immovable
Registration of Immovable
Presumption of Knowledge Based on Possession
Sale Does Not Break Lease
