摘要
柏拉图的洞穴隐喻提供了哲学问题的基本情景:它既包含纯粹哲学的思之擢升,亦包含实践/政治哲学的在世共处。海德格尔的洞喻解读意图道说柏拉图未曾言明的无蔽之真,这种赫拉克利特式含藏解蔽的斗争面相在对洞穴火堆的神庙疏解中得到彰显。施特劳斯的洞喻解读对纯粹哲学的存在之思保持了沉默,却对折返洞穴的苏格拉底式处境(城—哲冲突)进行了鞭辟入里的发微。总体来看,海氏和施氏代表了后尼采时代回返古希腊的两种不同路向:一方试图开启纯粹哲学重新开始的可能性,另一方试图直面哲学与诗之争的原初政治经验,尽管这两方面并未出离柏拉图的洞穴隐喻之外。海德格尔对太阳(善之相)的无视与施特劳斯对存在(西学之"体")问题的沉默,使得一方堕入虚无主义(形式主义)的深渊,另一方陷入主义之争的泥潭。因此,重新回到古希腊,在柏拉图洞穴隐喻的处境下拷问两位哲人的致思努力和各自偏废,对我们理解柏氏思想的丰富意涵和执两用中,恰切评估海氏、施氏哲学思考的整体脉象、眼界高下及其理论得失,具有拨云见日的解蔽意义。
Plato’s cave-metaphor provides the basic situation of philosophy reflection,by reason that it contains promotion of pure philosophy thought as well as Living coexistence of political philosophy.Heidegger’s interpretation of the cave metaphor wants to reveal Plato’s the truth of'Aletheia'unspoken,and the this kind of Heraclitus struggle is revealed in temple interpretation about the fire of cave.Strauss’interpretation of the cave metaphor keeps silence to the thought-of-being of the pure philosophy,but greatly concerned about Socratic situation of turn-back cave.In a word,Heidegger and Strauss represent the two different direction of return to the ancient Greek of post-Nietzsche period:One tried to open the possibility of pure philosophy restart,and the other one try to openness originally political experience of the conflict between the philosophy and politics,despite on the two side of inherent in Plato’s cave metaphor.But Heidegger’s disregard of the sun(good)and Strauss’silence to being,cause one head into nihilism another into factionalism struggle in recent years.Therefore,there are the vital significance that we think about the philosophical inquiry of Heidegger and Strauss in Plato’s cave metaphor situation to evaluate theoretical contributions and the shortcomings of two philosophers.
出处
《吉林大学社会科学学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第5期128-135,共8页
Jilin University Journal Social Sciences Edition
基金
国家社会科学青年基金项目(13CZX061)
第59批中国博士后科学基金面上资助项目(2016M591610)
