期刊文献+

瘢痕妊娠产妇经阴道分娩的临床效果分析 被引量:1

Clinical effect analysis of vaginal delivery for scar pregnancy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨瘢痕妊娠产妇经阴道分娩的临床效果。方法选取盐城市盐都区中西医结合医院2014年1月—2016年10月收治的瘢痕妊娠产妇66例作为观察组,另选取同期正常妊娠产妇66例作为对照组,均经阴道分娩。比较两组产妇分娩成功率、术中出血量、产程、住院时间及新生儿窒息率、新生儿Apgar评分,观察产妇产后并发症情况。结果两组产妇分娩成功率、术中出血量、产程、住院时间、新生儿窒息率及Apgar评分、并发症发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论在严格掌握适应证、严密监护产程的前提下,瘢痕妊娠产妇经阴道分娩安全可行。 Objective To investigate the clinical effect of vaginal delivery of scar pregnancy. Methods A total of66 cases of scar pregnancy puerpera were selected from January 2014 to October 2016 in Yancheng Yandu District Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine as observation group,66 cases of health puerpera were selected as control group,both groups were underwent vaginal delivery. The rate of delivery,intraoperatve blood loss,labor time,hospitalization time,neonatal asphyxia rate and Apgar score were compared between the two groups,and the complications were observed. Results No statistically significant differences of rate of delivery,intraoperatve blood loss,labor time,hospitalization time,neonatal asphyxia rate,Apgar score or complications rate was found between the two groups( P〉0. 05). Conclusion Under strictly control indications and mnitoring labor process,it is safe and feasible of vaginal delivery for scar pregnancy.
作者 张粉花
出处 《临床合理用药杂志》 2017年第21期26-27,共2页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Rational Drug Use
关键词 瘢痕妊娠 阴道分娩 治疗结果 Scar pregnancy Vaginal delivery Treatment outcome
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献34

  • 1黄瑾.瘢痕子宫再次分娩方式对产妇影响分折[J].中国社区医师(医学专业),2010,12(23):133-134. 被引量:7
  • 2魏丽丽,符凯薇.疤痕子宫再次妊娠分娩方式的选择[J].海南医学,2005,16(1):54-54. 被引量:2
  • 3Wang CB, Chiu WW, Lee CY, et al. Cesarean scar defect : correlation between Cesarean section number, defect size, clinical symptoms and uterine position[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol,2009,34( 1 ):85-89. 被引量:1
  • 4Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, Gtilmezoglu AM, et al. Method of deliv- ery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: the WHO global survey on ma- ternal and perinatal health 2007-08 [ J ]. Lancet, 2010,375 (9713) : 4490 -4491. 被引量:1
  • 5Allomuvor GF, Xue M, Zhu X, et al. The definition, aetiology, presen- tation, diagnosis and management of previous caesarean scar defects [ J]. J Obstet Gynaecol,2013,33 (8) :759-763. 被引量:1
  • 6Beucher G, Dolley P, Levy-Thissier S, et al. Maternal benefits and risks of trial of labor versus elective repeat caesarean delivery in women with a previous caesarean delivery[ J]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) ,2012,41 ( 8 ) :708-726. 被引量:1
  • 7Galyean AM, Lagrew DC, Bush MC, et al. Previous cesarean section and the risk of postpartum maternal complications and adverse neo- natal outcomes in future pregnancies[J]. J Periuatol,2009,29( 11 ) : 726-730. 被引量:1
  • 8Olusanya BO, Solanke OA. Adverse neonatal outcomes associated with trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery in an inner-city hospital in Lagos, Nigeria [ J ]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2009, 107 (2) :135-139. 被引量:1
  • 9Bujold E, Jastrow N, Simoneau J, et al. Prediction of complete uterine rupture by sonographie evaluation of the lower uterine segment[ J ]. Am J Obstet Gynecol,2009,201 (3) :320. 被引量:1
  • 10G. Beucher,P. Dolley,S. Lévy-Thissier,A. Florian,M. Dreyfus.??Bénéfices et risques maternels de la tentative de voie basse comparée à la césarienne programmée en cas d’antécédent de césarienne(J)Journal de Gynecologie Obstetrique et Biologie de la Reproduction . 2012 (8) 被引量:2

共引文献328

同被引文献13

引证文献1

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部