摘要
目的分析导乐陪伴分娩护理模式对顺产产程的影响。方法 2015年1月—2016年10月,入选对象514例,选择常规分娩护理的产妇352例,纳入常规组,选择导乐分娩的产妇162例,纳入导乐组。结果导乐组自然分娩成功率、产妇配合满意率、分娩进食率、分娩满意率、疼痛管理满意率分别为93.2%、96.9%、96.3%、88.9%、93.2%高于常规组86.4%、85.5%、79.0%、78.7%、75.0%,导乐组不规律宫缩发生率、胎心音监护异常率分别为4.9%、2.5%低于常规组10.2、7.7%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);导乐组活跃期、第一产程、第二产程分别为(18.50±4.63)、(20.41±3.88)、(0.74±0.36)h低于常规组(21.40±4.35)、(23.62±5.31)、(0.92±0.45)h,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论导乐分娩可改善缩短产程,改善分娩结局,获得产妇的好评。
Objective To analyze the effect of doula accompanied delivery nursing model on the easy labor stage. Methods 514 cases of patients from January 2015 to October 2016 were selected, 352 cases of delivery women with routine delivery nursing were selected as the routine group, while 162 cases of doula accompanied delivery were selected as the doula group. Results The natural delivery success rate, delivery women cooperation satisfactory rate, delivery feeding rate, delivery satisfactory rate and pain management satisfactory rate in the doula group were higher than those in the routine group, （93.2%,96.9%,96.3%,88.9%,93.2% vs 86.4%,85.5%,79.0%,78.7%,75.0%）, and the incidence rate of irregular contraction and fetal heart sound abnormality rate in the doula group were lower than those in the routine group, （4.9%,2.5% vs 10.2,7.7%）, and the differences had statistical significance（P〈0.05）, and the active stage, first labor stage and second labor stage in the doula group were lower than those in the routine group,[（18.50±4.63）,（20.41±3.88）h,（0.74±0.36）h vs （21.40±4.35）,（23.62±5.31）,（0.92±0.45）h], and the differences had statistical significance （P〈0.05）. Conclusion The doula delivery can shorten the labor stage, improve the delivery outcome and win the recognition of delivery women.
出处
《系统医学》
2017年第4期162-164,共3页
Systems Medicine
关键词
顺产
导乐分娩
分娩护理
产程
Easy labor
Doula delivery
Delivery nursing
Labor stage
