摘要
目的探究大学生肥胖与体适能水平之间的关系，为该类人群体适能管理提供研究依据。方法采集扬州市某高校725名男大学生身高、体质量、腰围以及体适能数据，依据世界卫生组织亚太平洋地区肥胖判定标准将研究对象分为4个组别[体质量指数肥胖组（BOG），腰围肥胖组（WOG），体质量指数和腰围均肥胖组（BWOG），正常体质量组（NG）]，采用Logistic回归探究大学生肥胖与体适能之间的关系。结果（1）肥胖组大学生1500m跑（P〈0．01）和仰卧起坐（P〈0．05）、BOG和WOG组俯卧撑（P〈0．01）、单脚站立时间以及BOG组身体移动反应时（P〈0．01）均低于正常体质量组。（2）BWOG和WOG组肺活量（P〈0．01）、BWOG和BOG组背力与握力（P〈0．01）高于正常体质量组。（3）多因素Logistic回归分析显示，与正常体质量组相比，1500m跑水平低的大学生发生身体质量指数肥胖（βBOG=-1．002，OR=0．367，95％CI=0．191～0．702，P〈0．01）和腰围肥胖（βWOG=-1．785，OR=0．169，95％CI=0．038-0．772，P〈0．05）危险度增加；肺活量高的大学生发生身体质量指数和腰围均肥胖（βBWOG=1．776，OR=5．901，95％CI=1．298～26．828，P〈0．05）以及腰围肥胖（βWOGG=1．681，OR=5．365，95％CI=1．667～24，670，P=0．032）危险度增加；俯卧撑（βBOG=-0．658，OR=0．518，95％CI=0．280～0．960，P〈0．05）和身体移动反应时（βBOG=-0．902，OR=0．405，95％CI=O．213～0．775，P〈0．01）低的大学生发生身体质量指数肥胖危险度增加；背力高的大学生的发生腰围肥胖危险度增加（βWOG=-1．583，OR=0．207，95％CI=0．045—0．946，P〈0．05）；握力高的大学生发生身体质量指数和腰围均肥胖（βBWOG=1．786，OR=5．974，95％CI=1．315～27．155，P〈0．05）、身体质量指数肥胖（βBOG=0．712，OR=2．036，95％CI=1．088—3．806，P〈0．05）危�
Objective To explore the relationship between obesity and the various parameters of physical fitness and provide the basis of physical fitness management for people. Methods A total of 725 male college students recruited from a University in Yangzhou.Height, weight, waist circumference and physi- cal fitness of the subjects were measured. According to Obesity criteria （BMI and/or WC ） , the college students were divided into the following 4 groups （ BMI obesity group （ BOG）, WC obesity group （ WOG）, BMI and WC obesity group （BWOG） and normal group （NG））. Logistic regression analysis was used to explore the relationship between obesity and physical fitness. Results （ 1 ） Significantly, 1 500 m （P〈 0.01 ） of BWOG,BOG and WOG,push-ups （P〈0.01） and standing time on one foot with closed eyes （P〈0.01） of BOG and WOG and whole body reaction time（P〈0.01 ） of BOG were lower than that of NG. （2） Vital capaci- ty of BWOG and WOG （P〈0.01） ,and grip strength （P〈0.01） and back strength of BWOG and BOG （P〈 0.05 ） were higher than that of NG. （3） Multiple logistic regression showed that the odds ratios of WOG（βBOG = - 1.002, OR= 0.367,95%CI= 0.191-0.702, P〈0.01 ） and BOG（βWOG = - 1.785, OR= 0. 169,95% CI= 0.038- 0.772,P〈0.05） for low 1 500 m subjects were higher,of BWOG（βBWOG= 1.776,OR= 5.901,95%CI= 1.298-26.828,P〈0.05） and BOG（βWOG = 1.681, OR= 5.365,95%CI= 1.667 ~ 24.670, P〈0.05 ） for high vital ca- pacity subjects were higher, of BOG for subjects of low Push-ups （βBOG = - 0. 658, OR= 0.518,95% CI = 0.280-0.960, P〈0.05 ） and whole body reaction time （βBOG = -0.902, OR= 0.405,95% CI= O. 213-0.775, P= 0.005 ） were higher, of WOG for high back strength （βWOG= - 1.583, OR = 0.207,95 % （21 = 0.045-0.946, P〈 0.05） were higher while of BWOG and BOG for high grip strength subjects （βBWOG= 1.786, OR= 5.974,95% CI-= 1.315-27.155 ,P〈0.05 ;βBOG = 0.712, OR= 2.036,95%CI= 1.088-3.806, P〈0.05 ） were higher,
出处
《中华行为医学与脑科学杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2017年第7期641-646,共6页
Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science
基金
扬州大学人文社科基金（XJJ2014-48）
关键词
男大学生
体适能
肥胖
体质量指数
Male college students
Physical fitness
Obesity
BMI
