期刊文献+

联合促性腺激素/枸橼酸氯米芬的非降调节卵巢刺激方案在卵巢反应不良患者中的应用 被引量:3

Comparison of the efficacy of a modified non-down regulation ovarian stimulation protocol and standard long protocol in poor responder
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨联合促性腺激素/枸橼酸氯米芬的非降调节卵巢刺激方案(改良卵巢刺激方案)在符合Bologna诊断标准的卵巢反应不良(POR)患者行IVF/ICSI-ET治疗中的应用价值。方法采用回顾性队列研究,收集2012年1月至2014年12月间在本院生殖中心行标准长方案IVF/ICSI-ET助孕的卵巢反应不良患者(SLP组,191例),同时依据患者年龄和基础窦卵泡数以1∶2比例匹配行改良卵巢刺激方案助孕的患者(MOS组,382例)。比较两组患者的各助孕指标和妊娠结局。结果 MOS组的平均获卵数及平均正常受精卵数均显著多于SLP组(P均<0.05)。虽MOS组与SLP组比较在每移植周期的累积临床妊娠率上无显著差异(55.34%vs.53.57%,P>0.05),但MOS组的周期取消率、早孕期流产率显著低于SLP组(分别为15.18%vs.23.56%和8.77%vs.20.00%)(P均<0.05),因此MOS组每启动周期的累积活产率显著高于SLP组(38.74%vs.28.79%,P=0.02)。Logistic多因素回归分析显示获卵数及可利用胚胎数增加时POR患者的累积活产率亦显著增加(P<0.001)。结论改良卵巢刺激方案在卵巢反应不良患者可获得优于标准长方案的临床助孕结局,其应是卵巢反应不良患者可选择的促排卵方案。 Objective: To explore the efficacy of a modified and non-down regulation ovarian stimulation protocol (continuously co-treated with clomiphene citrate and gonadotropin) in the treatment of poor ovarian responder(POR) in accordance with Bologna criteria. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted to collect the patients who underwent IVF/ ICSI-ET treatment in our center from January 2012 to December 2014. Among the patients, 191 patients with POR fulfilled the Bologna criteria and underwent IVF/ICSI-ET with standard long protocol(SLP group). The patients in SLP group were well-matched with POR patients undergone modified ovarian stimulation protocol(MOS group, n= 382) at ratio 1:2 according to their age and basal antral follicle count. The pregnancy indicators and outcomes were compared between the two groups. Results: The number of retrieved oocytes and normal fertilized zygotes in MOS group were significantly more than those in the SLP group(P〈0.05). Although there was no significant difference in the cumulative clinical pregnancy rate per embryo transfer cycle between the two groups(55.34% vs. 53.57%,P〉0.05),the cycle cancellation rate (15.18% vs. 23.56%) and the abortion rate(8.77% vs. 20.00%) in MOS group were significantly lower than those in the SI.P group (P〈0.05).Thus a significantly higher cumulative live birth rate per initiated cycle was observed in MOS group than that in SLP group(38.74% vs. 28.79%, P = 0. 02), Logistic regression analysis showed that the cumulative live birth rate was also significantly increased when the numbers of oocytes retrieved and transplantable embryos increased in the POR patients(P〈0. 001 ). Conclusions: The modified ovarian simulation protocol can achieve better clinical outcomes with the standard long protocol. It can be used as a new promising approach for POR patients.
作者 李艳辉 耿育红 陈莉娟 刘琳 陈春艳 高颖 LI Yan-hui GENG Yu-hong CHEN Li-juan LIU Lin CHEN Chun-yan GAO Ying(Department of Gynecology& Obstetrics ,Union Hospital, Huazhong University of Science& Technology, Wuhan 43002)
出处 《生殖医学杂志》 CAS 2017年第8期777-783,共7页 Journal of Reproductive Medicine
关键词 卵巢反应不良 排卵诱导 体外受精 胚胎移植 累积活产率 Poor ovarian response Ovulation induction In vitro fertilization Embryo transfer Cumulative live birth rate
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献22

  • 1叶虹.降调节是否降低卵巢反应性?控制性卵巢刺激低反应的处理[J].生殖医学杂志,2007,16(5):304-306. 被引量:6
  • 2田莉,鹿群,沈浣,陈曦,韩红敬.GnRH拮抗剂配伍HMG方案对卵巢低反应患者IVF-ET治疗结局分析[J].中国妇产科临床杂志,2008,9(1):38-40. 被引量:23
  • 3Polyzos NP,Devroey P.A systematic review of randomized trials for the treatment of poor ovarian responders:is there any light at the end of the tunnel?[J].Fertil Steril,2011,96:1058-1061.e7. 被引量:1
  • 4Janssens RM,Lambalk CB,Vermeiden JP,et al.Dosefinding stady of triptorelin acetate for prevention of a premateure LH surge in IVF:aprospective,randomized,double-blind,placebo-controlled study[J].Hum Reprod,2000,15:2333-2340. 被引量:1
  • 5Tarlatzis BC,Zepiridis L,Grimbizis G,et al.Clinical management of low ovarian response to stimulation for IVF:a systematic review[J].Hum Reprod Update,2003,9:61-76. 被引量:1
  • 6de Boer EJ,den Tonkelaar I,te Velde ER,et al.A Low number of retrieved oocytes at in vitro fertilization treatment is predictive of early menopause[J].Fertil Steril,2002,77:978-985. 被引量:1
  • 7Lisi F,Rinaldi L,Fishel S,et al.Evaluation of two doses of recombinant luteinizing hormone supplementation in an unselected group of women undergoing follicular stimulation for in vitro fertilization[J].Fertil Steril,2005,83:309-315. 被引量:1
  • 8Craft I,Gorgy A,Hill J,et al.Will GnRH antagonists provide new hope for patients considered‘difficult responders′to GnRH agonist protocols?[J].Hum Reprod,1999,14:2959-2962. 被引量:1
  • 9Akman MA,Erden HF,Tosun SB,et al.Comparison of agonistic flare-up-protocol and antagonistic multiple dose protocol in ovarian stimulation of poor responders:results of a prospective randomized trial[J].Hum Reprod,2001,16:868-870. 被引量:1
  • 10Pelinck MJ,Vogel NE,Hoek A,et al.Minimal stimulation IVF with late follicular phase administration of the GnRH antagonist cetrorelix and concomitant substitution with recombinant FSH:apilot study[J].Hum Reprod,2005,20:642-648. 被引量:1

共引文献5

同被引文献21

引证文献3

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部