摘要
目的探讨Zung氏焦虑自评量表和抑郁自评量表测评心血管病住院患者的适用性。方法采用问卷对209例住院患者进行一般资料、焦虑和抑郁自评量表的调查,利用项目分析、相关分析、信度分析探讨两量表的适用性。结果调查对象中焦虑和抑郁的发生率分别为27.3%和34.0%。焦虑自评量表和抑郁自评量表的Cronbach’sα系数分别为0.803和0.814。焦虑自评量表中有4个条目与总标准分相关性低(r<0.4),抑郁自评量表中有8项条目与总标准分相关性低(r<0.4)。两个量表中分别有2项条目删除后Cronbach’sα系数增大。结论虽两个自评量表操作简便、易于掌握并被广泛应用,但本研究结果却证实两个自评量表对心血管病住院患者的焦虑和抑郁心理评估的适用性较差,应不用或慎用。
Objective To explore the applicability of Zung＇ s Self-rating Anxiety Scale （SAS） and Self-rating Depression Scale （ SDS） in evaluating hospitalized patients in department of cardiovascular medicine. Methods We investigated 209 inpa- tients with cardiovascular disease by general information scale, SAS and SDS. The applicability of SAS and SDS was explored by i- tem analysis, correlation analysis and reliability analysis. Results The morbidities of anxiety and depression were 27.3% and 34.0% respectively. The Cronbach＇s α coefficients of SAS and SDS were 0.803 and 0.814 respectively. Four entries in SAS and eight entries in SDS were poorly correlated with the total standard score （ r〈0.4 ）. The Cronbach＇ sα coefficient was increased after two entries in SAS or in SDS were left out. Conclusions Although SAS and SDS are simple, easy to grasp and widely used, their applicability in assessing anxiety and depression of inpatients with cardiovascular disease is poor. Therefore, they should be left off or used with caution.
出处
《实用预防医学》
CAS
2017年第8期909-912,共4页
Practical Preventive Medicine
关键词
Zung氏焦虑
抑郁
量表
心血管病
适用性
Zung＇ s Self-Rating Anxiety Scale
cardiovascular disease
applicability
