期刊文献+

心理韧性量表在强制戒毒人群的信效度检验 被引量:8

Reliability and validity of CD-RISC resilience scale in drug abusers on treatment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探索Connor-Davidson心理韧性量表(Connor-Davidson resilience scale,CD-RISC)在强制戒毒人员中应用的信度和效度。方法:对656名强制戒毒人员施测自译的CD-RISC量表,并对测量结果进行信效度分析。结果:对施测结果进行探索性因素分析后获得五因素模型,分别为主体性、问题处理、稳定性、坚韧性和持续性,累积方差解释为56.94%;总量表及各因子的Cronbachα系数为0.628~0.905;总分与各因子的重测信度系数为:0.633~0.853;验证性因素分析结果良好,且优于源量表在该人群中的应用;量表总分及主体性、坚韧性因子与中国大五人格问卷简式版中的神经质因子的相关性具有统计学意义。结论:CD-RISC量表修订后的五因素模型在强制戒毒人群中运用良好,适用于该人群的心理韧性指标研究。 Objective:To explore the reliability and validity of Connor-Davidson resilience scale (CD-RISC) in drug abusers on treatment. Methods:A total of 656 compulsory drug addicts were tested with CD-RISC,and the reliability and validity of the measurement results were analyzed. Results:After exploratory factor analysis,5 factor models were obtained,including subjectivity,problem processing,stability,tenacity and persistence. The cumulative variance was explained as 56.94%. The Cronbach alpha coefficient of the total scale and each factor was 0.628-0.905 ;The test-retest reliability coefficient of the total score and each factor was:0.633-0.853 ;Confir- matory factor analysis results were good and better than the source scale in this population. The correlations be- tween the total score,subjective and tenacity factors and neuroticism factors in the Chinese Big Five Personality Inventory brief version (CBF-PI-B) were statistically significant. Conclusion:The revised CD-RISC with 5 factor model has good use in drug abusers on treatment,and applicable to the psychological toughness index of this population.
作者 林小亚 欧红霞 李桦 杨昕 Lin Xiaoya Ou Hongxia Li Hua Yang Xin(Department of Medical Psyehology,Nanjing Brain Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University,Nanjing 210029 Anhui Nanhu Compulsory Isolation Treatment Center,Xuancheng 242000, China)
出处 《南京医科大学学报(社会科学版)》 2017年第3期204-207,共4页 Journal of Nanjing Medical University(Social Sciences)
关键词 心理韧性 评定量表 信度 效度 强制戒毒人群 resilience rating scale reliability validity drug abusers on treatment
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献39

  • 1戴晓阳,吴依泉.NEO-PI-R在16~20岁人群中的应用研究[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2005,13(1):14-18. 被引量:21
  • 2孙鹏,宋华淼,苗丹民,刘军,徐蕊.飞行人员心理健康量表修订版的效度检验[J].中国临床康复,2006,10(38):11-13. 被引量:6
  • 3Ollson CA,Bond L,Burns JM,et al.Adolescent resilience:a concept analysis[J].J Adolesc,2003,26:1-11. 被引量:1
  • 4Mastern AS.Ordinary magic:resilience process in development[J].Am Psychologist,2001,56(3):227-238. 被引量:1
  • 5Connor KM,Davidson JR.Development of a new resilience scale:the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale(CD-RISC)[J].Depress Anxiety,2003,18(2):76-82. 被引量:1
  • 6Vaishnavi S,Connor K.An abbreviated version of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC),the CD-RISC2:psychometric properties and applications in psychopharmacological trials[J].Psychiatry Res,2007,152:293-297. 被引量:1
  • 7Yu XN,Zhang JX.Factor analysis and psychometric evaluation of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) with Chinese people[J].Soc Behav Personality,2007,35(1):19-30. 被引量:1
  • 8Campbell-Sills L,Stein MB.Psychometric analysis and refinement of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale(CD-RISC):validation of a 10-item measure of resilience[J].J Traumatic Stress,2007,20(6):1019-1028. 被引量:1
  • 9John OP, Naumann LR, Soto CJ. Paradigm shift to the inte- grative big five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual Issues. In John OP, Robins RW, Pervin LA. Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research. New York: The Guilford Press, 2008. 114-158. 被引量:1
  • 10Burisch M. You don't always get what you pay for: Measur- ing depression with short and simple versus long and so- phisticated scales. Journal of Research in Personality, 1984, 18:81-98. 被引量:1

共引文献353

同被引文献87

引证文献8

二级引证文献47

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部