摘要
目的:在中国大五人格问卷(CBF-PI)的基础上编制中国大五人格问卷简式版(Chinese Big Five PersonalityInventory brief version,CBF-PI-B)。方法:从CBF-PI中抽取部分条目组成测量大五人格维度的简式量表。结果:①CBF-PI-B含有40个条目,每个维度分别由8个条目测量;②简式版量表各维度具有较好的信度系数,内部一致性系数在0.764(宜人性)～0.814(神经质)之间,平均0.793;间隔10周的重测系数在0.672(宜人性)～0.811(开放性)之间,平均0.742。③简式版五因子结构较为清晰共可解释总方差变异的43.49%,各因子与完整版量表对应因子的相关均在0.85以上;各因子与NEO-PI-R对应因子间的相关在0.358(A)到0.846(C)之间;各因子与BFI对应因子间的相关在0.584(宜人性)到0.826(神经质)之间,相关系数均在0.01水平上显著。结论:CBF-PI-B具有较好的信效度,可用于相关研究。
Objective： The present study aimed to create a brief inventory（CBF-PI-B） to assess the five dimensions based on Chinese Big Five Personality Inventory（CBF-PI）.Methods： A set of good items were extracted from CBF-PI to form a brief scale.A total of 1221 college students were administered the CBF-PI.Other two samples including 54 and 53 college students completed both CBF-PI and NEO-PI-R or BFI,respectively.Results： ①CBF-PI-B included 40 items,which had good psychometric properties.Internal consistency reliabilities（Coefficient Alphas） of the CBF-PI-B ranging from 0.764（A） to 0.814（N）;the mean was 0.793.②The test-retest reliabilities 10 weeks after were also excellent,ranging from 0.672（A） to 0.811（O）;the mean was 0.742.③The CBF-PI brief version had clear factor structure.All items loaded above 0.40 on their intended factor.Five factors explained 43.49% of the total variance,and the variance explained by each factor at the same level,ranging from 8.16% to 9.15%.Equivalence coefficients between the CBF-PI and CBF-PI-B were above 0.85.④The factors of CBF-PI-B correlated strongly with relevant dimensions of NEO-PI-R and BFI,ranging from 0.358（A） to 0.846（C） and 0.584（A） to 0.826（N）,respectively.Conclusion： CBF-PI-B has good psychometric properties,which could be employed to relevant research.
出处
《中国临床心理学杂志》
CSSCI
CSCD
2011年第4期454-457,共4页
Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
关键词
大五模型
中国大五人格问卷
信效度
问卷编制
简式版
Big five model
Chinese big five personality inventory
Questionnaire development
Psychometric properties
