摘要
目的分析小儿呼吸道病毒感染的观察及热毒宁治疗效果。方法选择2016年5月—2017年2月76例小儿呼吸道病毒感染患儿,根据随机数字表分组,各38例。利巴韦林组采用利巴韦林治疗,热毒宁组用热毒宁治疗。比较两组呼吸道病毒感染治疗总有效率;咳嗽停止时间、鼻塞流涕消失时间、发热消失时间、咽部恢复正常时间;患儿不良反应发生率。结果热毒宁组呼吸道病毒感染治疗总有效率高于利巴韦林组,P<0.05;热毒宁组咳嗽停止时间、鼻塞流涕消失时间、发热消失时间、咽部恢复正常时间短于利巴韦林组,P<0.05;两组不良反应发生率相近,P>0.05。结论小儿呼吸道病毒感染采用热毒宁治疗效果确切,可有效改善患儿病情,缩短症状消失的时间,缩短疗程,无明显不良反应,适合小儿用药。
Objective To analyze the observation of respiratory tract virus infection in children and the effect of reduning. Methods From May 2016 to February 2017, 76 children with respiratory tract virus infection were divided into two groups according to the random number table, each with 38 cases. Ribavirin group treated with ribavirin, reduning group with reduning treatment. The total effective rate of two groups of respiratory tract infection treatment, cough stop time, nasal congestion runny nose disappearance time, fever disappeared time, pharynx returned to normal time, incidence of adverse reactions in children were compared. Results The total effective rate of respiratory poisoning was higher than that of ribavirin group（P〈0.05）. The time of coughing, the disappearance of nasal congestion, the disappearance of fever and the time of recovery of pharynx were shorter than Ribavirin group, P〈0.05. The incidence of adverse reactions in the two groups was similar, P〈0.05. Conclusion The treatment of respiratory infection in children with reduning is effective, can effectively improve the disease in children, shorten the time of disappearance of symptoms, shorten the course of treatment, no obvious adverse reactions, suitable for pediatric medication.
出处
《中国卫生标准管理》
2017年第13期117-118,共2页
China Health Standard Management
关键词
小儿呼吸道病毒感染
热毒宁
治疗效果
children with respiratory virus infection
reduning
treatment effect
