摘要
检察机关与环保社会组织同为法定环境公益诉讼起诉主体,二者之间的诉权平等并不意味着公益诉讼实施效果等同。诉权顺位是公益诉讼起诉机制的创新之举,旨在研究起诉主体的诉权优先次序,是诉讼公平正义理念下对诉讼效率的追寻。设置公益代表性标准和诉讼经济效益标准两大诉权顺位标准,将检察机关列为环境公益诉讼的第一顺位,这是基于对检察机关的公益性、独立性和经济性等多方评估的安排,对节约司法资源、优化司法公益救助效果,以及处理诉权竞合等方面均有所裨益。
Both the procuratorial organ and social environmental protection organization are main prosecution of environmental public interest litigation,but the equal litigious right between them does not mean that the implementation effect of public interest litigation is equal. The sequence of the litigation is the innovation of public interest litigation mechanism, aims at the optimal sequence of the main prosecution, which is the pursuit for the litigation efficiency in terms of litigation justice. The paper sets two standards of commonweal delegate lawsuit and economic commonweal lawsuit for the sequence of litigation in order to meet the need of current environmental law, ranks the procuratorial organ as the first environmental public interest litigation based on the arrangement of multiple assessment of public interest, independence and economy. It is beneficial for saving the judicial resources, optimizing the effect of judicial relief and dealing with litigation concurrence.
出处
《太原理工大学学报（社会科学版）》
2017年第3期33-37,73,共6页
Journal of Taiyuan University of Technology(Social Science Edition)
基金
国家社会科学基金项目"我国环境公益诉讼起诉资格法律制度研究"(14BFX112)
关键词
检察机关
诉权顺位
环境公益诉讼
起诉资格
procuratorial organ
sequence of the litigation
environmental public interest litigation
prosecution qualification
