摘要
目的:观察内热式针灸针治疗寒湿腰痛的临床疗效。方法:60例寒湿腰痛患者随机分为内热针组和温针组,每组30例。内热针组采用内热针治疗,温针组采用温针灸治疗。结果:内热针组治疗后总有效率为93.3%,温针组为70.0%;治疗后内热针组JOA评分、VAS评分及中医症状体征积分与温针组比较,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05),内热针效果较佳。结论:内热针与温针灸相比能够更加明显地改善寒湿腰痛患者的疼痛及各项功能,且更为安全、环保。
Objective： To compare the difference in the efficacy on low back pain of cold-dampness type between internal heating acupuncture needle therapy and wanning needle moxibustion therapy. Methods： Sixty cases of low back pain of cold-dampness type were randomized into internal heating acupuncture needle group and warming needle moxibustion group （30 cases in each group）. Results： The total efficacy rate was 93.3% in the internal heating acupuncture needle group, and 70.0% in the warming needle moxibustion group. There was statistically significant difference in the JOA score, VAS score and the symptom and physical signs score of low back pain of cold-dampness type between the two groups. Conclusion： Internal heating acupuncture needle is an effective way to treat low back pain of cold-dampness type. This therapy is characterized as much safer operation and less pollution.
作者
武欢
金玮
周玉梅
徐芸
张照庆
WU Huan JIN Wei ZHOU Yu-mei XU Yun ZHANG Zhao-qing(The Third Hospital of Wuhan, Wub.an43000)
出处
《实用中西医结合临床》
2017年第1期6-8,共3页
Practical Clinical Journal of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine
基金
湖北省武汉市卫生局科研课题(编号:WZ14B01)
关键词
寒湿型腰痛
内热针
温针灸
随机对照试验
Low back pain of cold-dampness type
Internal heating acupuncture needle
Warming needle moxibustion
Randomized controlled trial
