摘要
生态环境损害政府索赔制度旨在解决环境保护"公地悲剧"引发的"企业污染、政府买单"困局,但也与行政机关可以责令消除、修复环境并适用代履行的规定发生矛盾,故政府索赔应限缩到生态环境无法修复、因而无法适用上述规定的情形。从法律的体系性和逻辑的一致性来看,宜在未来修改法律时进一步增加不能修复时责令赔偿的规定,并通过行政公益诉讼监督政府履行监管职责。
The government claim for ecological damage aims to solve the dilemma of ＂ polluted by the enterprises,paid by the government＂ which caused by the tragedy of commons,however,this approach also raises contradictions with environmental regulation,as current laws have already set out a series of rules to rectify the illegal activities and relieve the ecological damage. As a result,the governmental claim shall be limited to circumstances which cannot be solved by administrative procedures. A better way is to directly order the offenders compensating the ecological damage in administrative laws,and allow competent organs or organizations to supervise the environmental regulation through administrative public interest litigations.
作者
张宝
ZHANG Bao(Law School, Central South University, Changsha Hunan 410083,China)
出处
《法学论坛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第3期14-21,共8页
Legal Forum
基金
司法部国家法治与法学理论研究项目"环境诉讼特别程序研究"(14SF0044)
湖南省社科基金项目"检察机关提起环境行政公益诉讼研究"(15YBA383)的部分成果
法治湖南建设与区域社会治理协同创新中心平台资助
关键词
生态环境损害
政府索赔权
环境监管权
ecological environmental damage
government claim
environment regulation power
public interest litigation
