摘要
法律人类学研究本身就是一种个案研究。法律人类学将美国法学院课堂上的"案例研究法"通过人类学田野调查进一步发展成为"问题个案"研究,成为当时这一领域的标准方法。而之后出现的"扩展个案",仍以"问题个案"为基础,扩展的内容依然是冲突和纠纷等特殊案例。法律人类学个案研究一直受困于对"个案"的理解,混淆了"个案"与"案件"。"日常个案"的提出,从关注冲突和纠纷到聚焦日常生活秩序,彻底澄清了混淆,是法律人类学个案研究的突破,反映了法律人类学对法律现象认识的深入。
Legal ethnography is in itself a kind of case study.Through the field work of anthropology,legal anthropology evolved the'casebook method'of law school in the United States into so-called'trouble case'which has become the standard method in this field.From the thing mentioned,legal anthropology has been confined into the study of conflict and dispute management processes under the spell of American legal realism and the so-called trouble case method.The'extended case study'is still based on the'trouble case',and the extension still refers to conflict and dispute.Legal anthropology is trapped in the understanding of the'case study',namely'case'and'legal case'were confused.Until the emergence of the'trouble-less case',the confusion was completely reflected.Contemporary Chinese legal anthropology should and have to go beyond the'trouble case'in the rural and urban study.
出处
《民族研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第1期59-67,共9页
Ethno-National Studies
关键词
法律人类学
个案研究
问题个案
扩展个案
日常个案
legal anthropology
case study
trouble case
extended case study
trouble-less case
