期刊文献+

执行抵销若干适用问题研究 被引量:3

Research on Some Applicable Problems of the Implementation of Offset
下载PDF
导出
摘要 执行抵销,从具体实施适用的角度上看,不仅被执行人申请执行抵销应当遵守有关执行异议申请程序的规定,执行法院的审查应当由执行法院组成的合议庭进行实质审查,以及允许被执行人以自然债权申请执行抵销,而且立法上对于不准抵销的裁定应当设置必要的救济程序。同时,在"法定抵销"与"认可抵销"适用条件的把握上,对于"法定抵销"应当征得申请执行人同意;对于"认可抵销"在申请执行人同意的条件下,即使被执行人所申请抵销的标的物与所负债务标的物种类、品质不相同的,也应当准予抵销。 The implementation of offset,in practice,means that not only the person subjected to execution shall obey the relevant regulations,but also the executive court shall carry out substantive examination by the collegiate panel,and the person subjected to execution shall be permitted to apply for the implementation of offset by natural claims. Moreover,necessary remedy procedure shall be established for the verdict which forbids implementing offset. Meanwhile,as to the application conditions of "statutory offset"and "recognized offset",the executor's approval shall be acquired in the case of "statutory offset ",while in the case of"recognized offset",even if the subject matters to be offset are different from the liabilities,the court shall permit the implementation of offset.
作者 廖中洪 蒋陆军 LIAO Zhong-hong JIANG Lu-jun(Law School, Southwest University of Political Science and Law, Chongqing 401120, China)
出处 《西南政法大学学报》 CSSCI 2017年第2期46-53,共8页 Journal of Southwest University of Political Science and Law
关键词 执行抵销 适用程序 自然债权 救济与适用 the implementation of offset application natural claims relief and application
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献16

  • 1John Rawls.A Theory of Justice,1971. 被引量:11
  • 2Lawrence M Friedman.A History of American Law,1985. 被引量:4
  • 3Gunther Teubner."Substantive and Reflexive Elements in Modern Law"Law and Society Review,1983. 被引量:2
  • 4MilsomSF. 被引量:2
  • 5Michael D.Bayles.Procedural Justice, Allocating to Individuals,1990. 被引量:1
  • 6J.Habermas.The Theory of Communicative Action,1987. 被引量:1
  • 7O. F. Robinsom and others.An Introduction to European Legal History,1985. 被引量:1
  • 8A. Engelmann and others.A History of Continental Civil Procedure,1927. 被引量:1
  • 9Morton J Horwitz.The transformation of American law,1977. 被引量:2
  • 10Justice William O.Douglas’s Comment in Joint Anti – Fascist Refugee Comm. v. Mcgrath, see United States Supreme Court Reports (95 Law. Ed. Oct. 1950 Term),1951. 被引量:1

共引文献746

同被引文献8

引证文献3

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部