摘要
针对政府采购订立补充合同实践中的乱象,以及人民法院对超额补充合同效力认定不一致的问题,采用比较分析的方法,分析认为产生问题的主要原因是立法缺位,次要原因是执法不严、有法不依。据此,提出两种解决方案:一是修改《政府采购法》第四十三条和第四十九条的规定,改变政府采购合同法律适用的规则和填补原四要件的漏洞,并根据补充合同的特殊性增加相关规定。二是采购人应加强自我规制,加强对补充合同的合法性审核。
In view of the confusion in the practice of signing supplementary contracts for government procurement,and the inconsistency of the validity of the excess supplementary contracts by the people’s courts,this paper adopts the method of comparative analysis to analyze that the main reason for the problems is the absence of legislation,and the secondary reasons are the lax enforcement and non-compliance of laws.Therefore,two solutions are put forward:one is to amend the provisions of Article 43 and Article 49 of the government procurement law,change the applicable rules of government procurement contract law and fill the loopholes of the original four elements,and add relevant provisions according to the particularity of the supplementary contract.Second,purchasers should strengthen self-regulation and strengthen the legitimacy audit of supplementary contracts.
作者
葛自丹
许志华
GE Zidan;XU Zhihua(Law School,Guangzhou University,Guangzhou 510006,China;Guangdong Haijiming Law Firm,Guangzhou 510006,China)
出处
《辽宁工程技术大学学报（社会科学版）》
2021年第1期57-66,共10页
Journal of Liaoning Technical University(Social Science Edition)
基金
广东省哲学社会科学规划项目(GD15CFX01)
关键词
政府采购
补充合同
法律规制
法律适用
自我规制
government procurement
supplementary contract
legal regulation
application of law
self regulation
